Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T03:17:35.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Functional Analysis Techniques to Develop Educational Support Plans for Students with High Support Needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Mark F. O’Reilly ,
Stephanie M. Peck ,
Jessica Webster ,
Sally Jo Baird ,
Kristen Plowman ,
Giulio E. Lancioni ,
Roisin Tieman ,
Marianne Gardiner  and
Orla Cummins
Mark F. O’Reilly*
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Dublin
Stephanie M. Peck
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Jessica Webster
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Sally Jo Baird
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Kristen Plowman
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Giulio E. Lancioni
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
Roisin Tieman
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Dublin
Marianne Gardiner
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Dublin
Orla Cummins
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Dublin
*
Correspondence to: Mark O’Reilly. Ph.D.. Department of Psychology. Science Building, National University of Ireland, Dublin. Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland. Phone/Fax: + 35345483615. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined the use of functional analysis methodologies to identify the environmental determinants of challenging behaviour for two students with severe disabilities. With one student the functional analysis was conducted in an outpatient clinic which was removed from the school setting. The functional analysis was conducted in the classroom setting with the other student. These assessments produced clear hypotheses regarding the controlling contingencies for challenging behaviour with both students. Individualised support plans were then developed and were successfully implemented by classroom personnel. The results of this study are discussed in terms of using a flexible approach to functional assessment in schools based on the individual characteristics of the student and the classroom context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 5 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, S. (1987). Functional and structural analysis of behavior: Approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bijou, S., Peterson, R., & Ault, M. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.Google Scholar
Carr, E., Newsom, C., & Binkoff, J. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 101–117.Google Scholar
Derby, K., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Northup, J., Cigrand, K., & Asmus, J. (1992). Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: A summary of 79 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 713–722.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G., Kern - Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387–397.Google Scholar
Durand, V., & Carr, E. (1987). Social influences on “self- stimulatory” behavior: Analysis and treatment application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 119–132.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (1995). Challenging behavior: Analysis and intervention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grosenick, J., George, N., George, M., & Lewis, T. (1991). Public services for behaviorally disordered students: Program practices in the 1980’s. Behavioral Disorders, 16, 87–96.Google Scholar
Iwata, B., Pace, G., Dorsey, M., Zarcone, J., Vollmer, T., Smith, R., Rodgers, T., Lerman, D., Shore, B., Mazaleski, J., Goh, H., Cowdery, G., Kalsher, M., McCosh, K., & Willis, K. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, L., & Dunlap, G. (1998). Curriculum modifications to promote desirable classroom behavior. In Luiselli, J. K., & Cameron, M. J. (Eds.), Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support (pp. 289–307). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Koegel, L., Koegel, R., & Dunlap, G. (1996). Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Lennox, D., & Miltenberger, R. (1989). Conducting a functional assessment of problem behavior in applied settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 304 – 311.Google Scholar
Leslie, J., & O’Reilly, M. (1999). Behavior analysis: Foundations and applications to psychology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Mace, F., Lalli, J., & Lalli, E. (1991). Functional analysis and the treatment of aberrant behavior. Research In Developmental Disabilities, 12, 155–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, M., Hillery, J., Caulwell, K., Cummins, O., Nic Dhomhnaill, O.., Murphy, J., & Lancioni, G. (in press). Outpatient assessment of aberrant behaviour for a child with developmental disability and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Irish Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., King, L., Lally, G., & Nic Dhomhnaill, O. (in press). Using brief assessments to evaluate aberrant behavior maintained by attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
Paisey, T., Whitney, R., & Hislop, P. (1990). Client characteristics and treatment selection: Legitimate influences and misleading inferences. In Repp, A.C. & Singh, N.N. (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 175–197). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.Google Scholar
Reichle, J., & Wacker, D. (1993). Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Sasso, G., Reimers, T., Cooper, L., Wacker, D., Berg, W., Steege, M., Kelly, L., & Allaire, A. (1992). Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 809–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollmer, T., Iwata, B., Zarcone, J., Smith, R., & Mazaleski, J. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) and differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9–22.Google Scholar
Wacker, D., Northup, J., & Cooper, L. (1992). Behavioral assessment. In Greydanus, D. & Wolraich, M. (Eds.), Behavioral pediatrics (pp. 57–68). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar