Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:26:58.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Ethical Problems in Special Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

John A. Codd
John A. Codd*
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines, from a philosophical perspective, some of the main ethical problems pertaining to the special education field. It is argued that while special education practice has been strongly grounded in psychological theory, it has not always been adequately justified by reference to general moral principles. Rationales for intervention are mostly couched in descriptive or explanatory terms while the over-riding prescriptive or evaluative dimensions are often presupposed without explicit justification. Particular issues such as diagnostic assessment, educational placement and behavioural management can be seen to entail complex ethical problems concerning the consideration of individual rights and interests, equality of educational opportunity, and respect for personal autonomy. Examples of the moral dilemmas inherent in particular special educational practices are examined. Finally, it is claimed that special educators must be able to defend not only the empirical bases of their educational theories, but also the value judgments implicit in them.

Type
Research and Review
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , May 1982 , pp. 8 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, R. J., Elkins, J., Berry, P. B., Burge, J. A. A Survey of Special Education in Australia, Canberra: Schools Commission, 1979.Google Scholar
Bandman, B. ‘Some Legal, Moral and Intellectual Rights of Children’, Educational Theory, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1977, pp. 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. M. ‘A Study of Ascertainment for Special Education in Scotland, 1973–75’, in Dockrell, W. B. Dunn, W. R. Milne, A. (eds.) Special Education in Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education, 1978, pp. 76–92.Google Scholar
Codd, J. A. ‘Hyperactive Children: Problems, Issues and Approaches’, New Zealand Medical Journal, Vol. 88, No. 622, 1978, pp. 333–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Codd, J. A. The Resource Room Concept in Special Education’, in Bates, R. J. and Codd, J. A. (eds.) Theory and Practice in New Zealand Education, Palmerston North N.Z.: Dunmore Press, 1980, pp. 297–318.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Science, Special Educational Needs, (The Warnock Report), London: H.M.S.O., 1978.Google Scholar
Downie, R. S., Loudfoot, E. M. and Telfer, E. Education and Personal Relationships, London: Methuen, 1974.Google Scholar
Elliot, R. ‘Distributive Justice, Education and the Handicapped’, in Laura, R. S. (ed.) Problems of Handicap, Melbourne: Macmillan, 1980, pp. 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H. ‘Equality of Educational Opportunity’, in Strike, K. A. and Egan, K. (eds.) Ethics and Educational Policy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978, pp. 168–90.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. M. and Goodwin, C. Educating Slow-Learning and Maladjusted Children: Integration or Segregation?, London: Longmans, 1979.Google Scholar
Gast, D. L. and Nelson, C. M. ‘Legal and Ethical Considerations for the Use of Timeout in Special Education Settings’, Journal of Special Education, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1977, pp. 457–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. Theory and Practice, London: Heinemann, 1974.Google Scholar
Harris, A. and Kapche, R. ‘Behaviour Modification in Schools: Ethical Issues and Suggested Guidelines’, Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1978, pp. 25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House of Representatives Select Committee on Specific Learning Difficulties, Learning Difficulties in Children and Adults, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1976.Google Scholar
Kleinig, J. ‘Privacy, Personal Identity and Handicap’, in Laura, R. S. (ed.) Problems of Handicap, Melbourne: Macmillan, 1980, pp. 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, A. L. ‘Values Education and the Right to Privacy’, Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1977, pp. 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, H. J. ‘Handicapped Persons and the Rights they Possess: The Right to Life, Liberty, Self-Development, Development of Self, in Laura, R. S. (ed.) Problems of Handicap, Melbourne: Macmillan, 1980, pp. 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, K. R. ‘Adapting Schools to Exceptional Students’, in Proceedings of the Second National Conference of the National Council of Independent Schools on Exceptional Children in a Normal School Situation, Canberra, 1979, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
O’Leary, S. G. and O’Leary, K. D. ‘Ethical Issues of Behaviour Modification Research in Schools’, Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1977, pp. 299–307.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. S. Ethics and Education, London: Allen and Unwin, 1966.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, I. and Lankshear, C. Education and Rights, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Victorian State Government, White Paper on Strategies and Structures for Education in Victorian Government Schools, Melbourne: Government Printer, 1980.Google Scholar
Watts, B. H. ‘Special Education in the Seventies: Promises and Problems’, The Slow Learning Child, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1975, pp. 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar