Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:38:56.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science versus Basic Educational Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Siegfried Engelmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One goal of basic research in education is to identify the variables of effective instruction. As this pursuit has been conceived, however, its theoretical problems make it unlikely that the effort will provide a clear picture of instructional variables, their interactions, or the kind of teacher training that is implied by instructional variables.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 32 , Issue 1: A Scientific Approach to Special Education , April 2008 , pp. 139 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., Wilkinson, I. A. G. with contributions from members of the Commission on Reading (1984). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, Center for the Study of Reading.Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Becker, W. C., & Engelmann, S. (1978). Analysis of achievement data on six cohorts of low-income children from 20 school districts in the University of Oregon Direct Instruction Follow Through Model (Follow Through Project, Technical Report No. 78–1). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. et al. (1978). Corrective Reading, Decoding B Teacher’s Guide. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. C. (1974). DISTAR I, II. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1980). Young children grow up: The effects of the Perry Preschool on youth through age 15. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar