Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:48:24.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘How Shall We Sign That?’: Interactions Between a Profoundly Deaf Tutor and Tutee Involved in a Cross-Age Paired Reading Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Julie King  and
Richard Taffe
Julie King*
Affiliation:
St Monica’s Primary School, Wodonga, Victoria
Richard Taffe*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Mrs Julie King, Teacher, St Monica's Primary School, Brockley Street, WODONGA, VIC 3690. Ph: (02) 6024 3151 Fax: (02) 6056 1747.
Dr Richard Tafle, Murray Education Unit, Faculty of Education, Charles Sturt University, ALBURY NSW 2640. Ph: 02 6051 6765 Fax: 02 6051 6985 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on the use of a cross‐age tutoring program designed to improve the literacy skills of a profoundly deaf girl. In a novel approach to such programs, both tutor and tutee participants were profoundly deaf and used Auslan as their common mode of communication. The results of the program indicate that cross‐age peer tutoring has potential as an effective strategy for improving the literacy achievements of deaf children like the tutee participant. Analysis of the videotaped interactions between tutor and tutee over the course of the program provided unique insights into the nature of English literacy learning by profoundly deaf students. These insights point to a role for strategies like cross‐age tutoring where the particular experience of. deafness can be used to promote more effective interpretation and understanding of English for profoundly deaf literacy learners.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , 2003 , pp. 68 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974-1983 In Shildroth, R.N. & Karchmer, M.A. (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161–206). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Eli, N., Bar-Eli, M., Tenenbaum, G., & Forlin, C. (1998). The tutoring process and its manifestation in the classroom behaviour of tutors and tutees. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 283–300.Google Scholar
Carver, R. (1990). The challenge: Access, literacy and the deaf child. Plenary Address. 12th Biennial Convention of the American Society of Deaf Children. Vancouver , British Columbia.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. (1993). Deaf children learning language in a natural learning environment: The role of interactions in learning about reading and writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 16, 213–224.Google Scholar
Clay, M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Depree, H., & Iverson, S. (1994). Early literacy in the classroom: A new standard for young readers. Auckland: Lake Ends.Google Scholar
Devin-Sheenan, L., Feldman, R., & Allen, V. (1976). Research on children tutoring children: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 46, 355–385.Google Scholar
Ellwood, C. (1997). Re-visioning deafness: Supporting literacy in Auslan. Literacy and Numeracy Studies: An International Journal in the Education and Training of Adults. 7(1), 77–88.Google Scholar
Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Committee (2002). Education of students with disabilities, Commonwealth Government: Canberra.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N., & Hamlett, C. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S., & Mangiola, L. (1991). Children of promise: Literate activity in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Liddell, S., & Erting, C. (1989). Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education. Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89-3 Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Komesaroff, L. (1998). The politics of language practices in deaf education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria.Google Scholar
Labbo, L., & Teale, W. (1990). Cross-age reading: A strategy for helping poor readers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 362–369.Google Scholar
Leland, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (1993). Cross-age interaction builds enthusiasm for reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 47, 292–301.Google Scholar
MacMillan, A. (1998). Responsiveness as a viable interpersonal relation in teacher-directed discourses. Early Child Development and Care, 140, 95–113.Google Scholar
Matthews, T., & Reich, C. (1993). Constraints on communication in classrooms for the deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 14–18.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (1992). Literacy and empowerment. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 15, 123–138.Google Scholar
Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can’t hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 9–31.Google Scholar
Nelson Project (1995). The rainbow reading project. Auckland: Nelson.Google Scholar
Nugent, M. (2001). Raising reading standards - The reading partners approach: Cross-age peer tutoring in a special school. British Journal of Special Education, 28(2), 71–79.Google Scholar
Oldfather, P., West, J., White, V., & Wilmarth, J. (1999). Learning through children’s eyes: Social constructivism and the desire to learn. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Paul, P. (1998). Literacy and deafness: The development of reading, writing, and literate thought. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Paul, P., & Quigley, S. (1994). Language and deafness (2nd> ed.). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, (1), 32–50 Google Scholar
Pollard, A., & Tann, S. (1993). Reflective teaching in the primary school: A handbook for the classroom (2nd> ed.). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Power, D., (1998). Deaf and hard of hearing students. In Ashman, A. & Elkins, J. (Eds.) Educating children with special needs (3rd ed.). Sydney: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Power, D., & Leigh, G. (2000). Principles and practices of literacy development for deaf learners: A historical overview. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 3–8.Google Scholar
Rekrut, M. (1994). Peer and cross-age tutoring: The lessons of research. Journal of Reading, 37, 356–361.Google Scholar
Rohrbeck, C., Ginsburg-Block, M., Fantuzzo, J., & Miller, T. (2003). Peer assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 2, 240–257 Google Scholar
Samway, K., Whang, G., & Pippitt, M. (1995). Buddy reading: Cross-age tutoring in a multicultural school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Scottish Council for Research in Education (1981). Burt word reading test: New Zealand revision. Auckland: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
The Reading Project (1996). PM Benchmark Kit.> Melbourne: Nelson.+Melbourne:+Nelson.>Google Scholar
Topping, K. (1989). Peer tutoring and paired reading: Combining two powerful techniques. The Reading Teacher, 42, 488–494.Google Scholar
Topping, K., & Lindsay, G. (1992). Paired reading: A review of the literature. Research Papers in Education, 5, 199–247.Google Scholar
Urzua, C. (1995). Cross-age tutoring in the literacy club. ERIC Digest. ERIC clearinghouse on languages and linguistics, Washington, DC (EDRS: ED386949).Google Scholar
Wasik, B. (1998). Developing a common language: A response to Topping. The Reading Teacher, 52, 52–54.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. (2000). The use of ASL to support the development of English and literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 81–104.Google Scholar
Williams, C. (1994). The language and literacy worlds of three profoundly deaf preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 125–155 Google Scholar
Winter, S. (1991). What really happens during a paired reading project? British Journal of Special Education, 18, 20–24 Google Scholar
Winter, S. (1996). Paired reading: Three Questions. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar