Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:48:22.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Contingent Reinforcement for Peer Imitation on a Preschool Downs Syndrome Child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Christine Rietveld
Christine Rietveld*
Affiliation:
New Zealand Society for the Intellectually Handicapped, Canterbury Branch, Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Baseline observations indicated that little peer imitation took place by a 3 year old Downs Syndrome boy integrated into a local kindergarten. The imitation of more developmentally advanced children is generally presumed to be an important benefit to be derived from integration, and the purpose of the present study was to teach peer imitation, through the use of contingent verbal reinforcement for appropriate peer imitation. A multiple-baseline across the three different classes of behaviour, was used to measure the number of imitations (probes) out of a possible five that occurred when they were modelled by the experimenter at the end of the Peer-Imitation Training sessions. The number of probes imitated, increased rapidly for block play, once reinforcement was introduced during the Peer Training sessions on day 3. After day 5, the number increased in both sand and dough play as well, and generalisation occurred. The high, stable rate of peer imitation responses in such a short amount of time by a retarded child indicates the usefulness of this approach as a tool to aid integration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , November 1981 , pp. 30 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apolloni, T., Cooke, S. A. and Cooke, T. P. Establishing a normal peer as a behavioural model for developing delayed toddlers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devoney, C., Guralnick, M. J. and Rubin, H. Integrating handicapped and non-handicapped preschool children; effects on social play. Childhood Education, 1974, 50, 360–364.Google Scholar
Guralnick, M. J., The value of integrating handicapped and non-handicapped preschool children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1976, 42, 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, C. A., Apolloni, T., Cooke, T. P. and Rauer, S. A. Teaching retarded preschoolers to imitate the free play behaviour of non-retarded classmates: trained and generalised effects. Journal of Special Education, 1978, 12, 195–207.Google Scholar
Warfield, G. J. (Ed.). Mainstream currents: reprints from Exceptional Children, 1968–1974. Reston, V. A.: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1974.Google Scholar