Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:48:53.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of a Locus of Control Measure Designed to Assess Intellectually Disabled Students’ Beliefs in Adaptive Behaviour Situations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Bruce Allen Knight
Bruce Allen Knight*
Affiliation:
The University of New England, Armidale
*
Correspondence concerning this paper may be sent to Dr B A Knight, Department of Learning, Development and Communication, The University of New England, Armidale, 2351
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents the background outlining the development of a locus of control measure designed to examine intellectually disabled students’ expectancy of control of reinforcement in the adaptive behaviour domains. The importance of students’ locus of control in behavioural situations is discussed, as is the theoretical framework upon which the Knight Adaptive Behaviour Locus of Control Scale was developed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , 1992 , pp. 13 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashman, A. & Elkins, J. (Eds.). (1990). Educating children with special needs. Sydney: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bejar, L.I. (1980). Biased assessment of program impact due to psychometric artifacts. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 513–524.Google Scholar
Brown, R. Weed, K. & Evans, I.M. (1987). Perceptions of handicapped and non-handicapped students of the importance and utility of their high school curricula. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, September, 185–196.Google Scholar
Crandall, V.C., Ratkovsky, W. & Crandall, V.J. (1965). Children’s beliefs in their own control of reinforcement in intellectual-academic achievement situations. Child Development, 26, 91–109.Google Scholar
De Vellis, R.F. & McCaulay, C. (1979). Perception of contingency and mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 261–270.Google Scholar
Dever, R.B. (1989). A taxonomy of community living skills. Exceptional Children, 55, 395–404.Google Scholar
Doll, E.A. (1935). A Genetic Scale of Social Maturity. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 5, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, E.A. (1965). Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service. DuCette, J., Wolk, S. & Soucar, E. (1972). Atypical patterns in locus of control and nonadaptive behaviour. Journal of Personality, 40, 287–297.Google Scholar
Ford, L.H., & Rubin, B.M. (1970). Asocial desirability questionnaire for young children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P.B. (1972). Locus of control and self-concept in mildly retarded adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 2807–B.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R.L., Henighan, R.P. & Barnard, C. (1972). Locus of Control: An example of dangers in using children’s scales with children. Child Development, 43, 579–590.Google Scholar
Grossman, H.J. (Ed.) (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Huberty, T.J., Koller, J.R. & Ten Brink, T.D. (1980). Adaptive behavior in the definition of mental retardation. Exceptional Children, 46, 256–261.Google Scholar
Keller, H.R. (1986). In-school adaptive behavior: Assessment domains of behavior rating scales and child characteristics. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
Knight, B.A. (1991a). The development and implementation of a teaching perspective designed to modify intellectually disabled students’ external locus of control. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of New England, Annidale.Google Scholar
Knight, B.A. (1991b). A teaching perspective of guided internality relevant to teachers of intellectually disabled students. Proceedings of the 15th Australian Association of Special Education, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Lawrence, E.A., & Winschel, J.F. (1975). Locus of control: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children, 41, 483–490.Google Scholar
Lefcourt, H.M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Zeiss, R. & Zeiss, A. (1974). Internal-external control and persistence: Validation and implication of the Stanford Preschool Internal-External Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 265–278.Google Scholar
Phillips, E.L. (1978). The social skills basis of psychopathology. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Ringelheim, D., Bialer, I. & Morrissey, H. (1970). Modified Intellectual Achievement Responsibility Questionnaire. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Rotter, J.B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consuiting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 56–67.Google Scholar
Rotter, J.B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45, 489–493.Google Scholar
Smith, J.D., & Polloway, E.A. (1979). The dimension of adaptive behavior in mental retardation research: An analysis of recent practices. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 203–206.Google Scholar
Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Classroom Edition. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Wang, M.C. (1983). Development and consequences of students’ sense of personal control. In Levine, J. and Wang, M.C. (Eds), Teacher and student perceptions: Implciations for learning (pp. 213–247). Hillsdale Erlbaum.Google Scholar