Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:47:30.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current U.S. Practice in Assessing and Making Decisions About Handicapped Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

James E. Ysseldyke
James E. Ysseldyke*
Affiliation:
Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota. Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities at University of Minnesota. Exceptional Children
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

James E. Ysseldyke

An overview of findings from a major national six-year study of practices in making referral, classification/placement/eligibility, instructional, and evaluation decisions is provided. This includes the composition and deliberations of placement teams, the relationship between decisions made and how students perform on tests, and the technical adequacy of tests. Implications for practice are drawn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1986 , pp. 13 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algozzine, B. & Korinek, L. (1985). Where is special education for students with high prevalence handicaps going? Exceptional Children, 51, 388–396.Google Scholar
Algozzine, B., Christenson, S. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1982). Probabilities associated with the referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 19–23.Google Scholar
Epps, S., Ysseldyke, J. E. & McGue, M. (1984). Differentiating LD and non-LD students: I know one when I see one. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 89–101.Google Scholar
Graden, J. L., Thurlow, M. L. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1983). Instructional ecology and academic responding time for students at three levels of teacher-perceived behavioral competence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 241–256.Google Scholar
Mirkin, P. K., Fuchs, L. S. & Deno, S.L. (1982). Considerations for designing a continuous evaluation system: An integrative review. Monograph No. 20. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Potter, M., Ysseldyke, J. E., Regan, R. & Algozzine, B. (1983). Eligibility and classification decisions in educational settings: Issuing passports in a state of confusion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 146–157.Google Scholar
Salvia, J. & Ysseldyke, J. E., (1985). Assessment in Special and Remedial Education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Thurlow, M. L. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1979). Current assessment and decision making practices in model programs for learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 15–24.Google Scholar
Thurlow, M. L. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1983). Instructional intervention research: An integrative summary of findings. Research Report No. 143. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Thurlow, M. L., Christenson, S. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1983). Referral research: An integrative summary of findings. Research Report No. 141. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Thurlow, M. L., Graden, J., Greener, J. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1983). Opportunity to learn for LD and non-LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 283–288.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E. (1979). Issues in psychoeducational assessment. In Phye, G. & Reschly, D. (Eds.), School Psychology: Perspectives and Issues. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E. (1983). Current practices in making psychoeducational decisions about learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 226–233.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E. & Thurlow, M. L. (1983). Identification/classification research: An integrative summary of findings. Research Report No. 142. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B. & Allen, D. (1982). Participation of regular education teachers in special education team decision making: A naturalistic observation. Exceptional Children, 48, 365–366.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B. & Epps, S. (1983). A logical and emphirical analysis of current practice in classifying students as handicapped. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166 Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B. & Mitchell, J. (1982). Special education team decision making: An analysis of current practice. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60, 308–313.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Regan, R. & McGue, M. (1981). The influence of test scores and naturally occurring pupil characteristics on psychoeducational decision making with children. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 167–177.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Regan, R. & Potter, M. (1980). Technical adequacy of tests used by professionals in simulated decision making. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 202–209.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Richey, L. & Graden, J. (1982). Declaring students eligible for learning disability services: Why bother with the data? Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Shinn, M. & McGue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences among low achievers and students labelled learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L. & Christenson, S. (1983). Evaluation research: An integrative summary of findings. Research Report No. 144. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar