Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:03:07.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acknowledging quality in New Zealand special education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Keri Wilton
Keri Wilton*
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, Auckland NZ
*
Presidential address to Third National Conference of the New Zealand Special Education Association - Auckland, May 1992. Correspondence should be directed to Associate Professor Keri Wilton, University of Auckland, Auckland NZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New Zealand has much of real quality to be proud of in special education. On numerous international surveys of education, New Zealand schools continue to rank highly - especially with respect to reading and written language, and were such surveys to focus on special educational matters, my guess is that the picture would be equally positive. There are very real difficulties in developing special educational provisions for a country with New Zealand’s geographical characteristics. New Zealand has a relatively small total population, which is scattered widely across a rather large and geographically well separated area, and these factors make for real problems in providing for children with difficulties which occur infrequently - as do most conditions associated with exceptionality and special education.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 14 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Department of Education (1987). Draft review of special education. Wellington: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Johansen, P. (1991). Intelligence testing in New Zealand and the WISC-R. New Zealand Psychological Society Bulletin, # 70, 22–34.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (1991). Special education in New Zealand: Statement of intent. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Saunders, J., Wilton, K.M., & Tuck, B.F. (1987). Employment and adjustment of deaf school leavers. Australian Journal of Special Education, 11, 18–25.Google Scholar
Tosswill, J., Tuck, B.F., & Wilton, K.M. (1992). Quality of life and job satisfaction of young adults with mild intellectual disability (study in progress, University of Auckland).Google Scholar
Wilton, K.M. (1988). Research on integration of children with mild intellectual disability: Issues and problems. In Ashman, A. (Ed.) Integration: Twenty-five years on. Brisbane: Exceptional Child Research Monographs (No.1).Google Scholar
Wilton, K.M., Tuck, B.F.. Yates, C., Irwin, S. & Coffey, B. (1988). Employment and adjustment of school-leavers with mild retardation in New Zealand. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 14, 235–244.Google Scholar