Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:05:05.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using a Systematic Review to Explore Single-Subject Design Use Within Special Education Over Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2020

Jessica Zoe Zanuttini Open the ORCID record for Jessica Zoe Zanuttini [Opens in a new window]
Jessica Zoe Zanuttini*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While teachers and researchers of students with disability are commonly interested in individual students and their progress towards individualised goals, traditional approaches to educational research that aim to illustrate generalisation between cause and effect are still commonly used. Traditional approaches, such as group-comparison designs, are used to demonstrate improved performance for the average student; however, they also obscure individual student data. Within special and inclusive education, single-subject designs may provide more appropriate conclusions to particular types of questions than traditional research methods as they allow for the examination of a functional relationship between the dependent and independent variables and rely on the participant serving as their own control. This article provides a summary of the use of single-subject designs within the field of special education over time and the findings of a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA statement are presented. Through this systematic review, published articles from 7 prominent special education journals that involved intervention for school-aged students with disability were examined. In addition, a sample of exemplar studies that have employed single-subject designs are discussed.

Keywords

single-subject designsystematic reviewspecial and inclusive educationexperimental designPRISMA
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , July 2020 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Michael Arthur-Kelly.

References

Alnahdi, G. H. (2015). Single-subject designs in special education: Advantages and limitations. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 15, 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banda, D. R., & Therrien, W. J. (2008). A teacher’s guide to meta-analysis. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(2), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804100208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cakiroglu, O. (2012). Single subject research: Applications to special education. British Journal of Special Education, 39, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2012.00530.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, England: Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342Google Scholar
Conroy, M. A., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Alter, P. J. (2005). A descriptive analysis of positive behavioral intervention research with young children with challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214050250030301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B. G., & Cook, L. (2016). Research designs and special education research: Different designs address different questions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, L., Cook, B. G., Landrum, T. J., & Tankersley, M. (2008). Examining the role of group experimental research in establishing evidence-based practices. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208324504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Derenne, A., & Baron, A. (1999). Human sensitivity to reinforcement: A comment on Kollins, Newland, and Critchfield’s (1997) quantitative literature review. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391976CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, S. A., Ross, M. E., & Chesser, S. S. (2011). Single-subject designs and action research in the K–12 setting. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2011.599555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2014). Visual analysis of graphic data. In Gast, D. L. & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 176–210). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203521892-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, B. (1980). Single subject research strategies in occupational therapy, part 1. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.34.2.103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, D., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research designs: 1983–2007. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 187–202.Google Scholar
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, R. H., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2012). Synthesizing single-case research to identify evidence-based practices: Some brief reflections. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9152-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, R. H., Swaminathan, H., Sugai, G., & Smolkowski, K. (2012). Considerations for the systematic analysis and use of single-case research. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2012.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, P., Acee, T., Chung, W.-H., Hsieh, Y.-P., Kim, H., Thomas, G. D., … Robinson, D. H. (2005). Is educational intervention research on the decline? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, IL: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Kouo, J. L. (2019). The effectiveness of a packaged intervention including point-of-view video modeling in teaching social initiation skills to children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618815887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510743.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (1992). Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725994Google Scholar
Lessen, E., Dudzinski, M., Karsh, K., & Van Acker, R. (1989). A survey of ten years of academic intervention research with learning disabled students: Implications for research and practice. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 106–122.Google Scholar
Maciver, D., Hunter, C., Adamson, A., Grayson, Z., Forsyth, K., & McLeod, I. (2018). Supporting successful inclusive practices for learners with disabilities in high schools: A multisite, mixed method collective case study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40, 1708–1717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1306586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maggin, D. M., Cook, B. G., & Cook, L. (2018). Using single-case research designs to examine the effects of interventions in special education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastropieri, M. A., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K. A., Graff, H., Marshak, L., Conners, N. A., … Cuenca-Sanchez, Y. (2009). What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907600105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, S. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020537805154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonnell, J., & O’Neill, R. (2003). A perspective on single/within subject research methods and “scientifically based research”. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.28.3.138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2013). The three-level synthesis of standardized single-subject experimental data: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.816621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Public Library of Science Medicine, 6(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Google ScholarPubMed
Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, M. L., & Franco, J. H. (2008). (Effect) size matters: And so does the calculation. Behavior Analyst Today, 9, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, M. L., & Smith, B. W. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000301238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. E., & Ferron, J. M. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis of single-case designs. In Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., & Pullen, P. C. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 168–186). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517698-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satsangi, R., Hammer, R., & Hogan, C. D. (2019). Video modeling and explicit instruction: A comparison of strategies for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seethaler, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). A drop in the bucket: Randomized controlled trials testing reading and math interventions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00125.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şen, N., & Şen, S. (2019). Calculation of effect size in single-subject experimental studies: Examination of non-regression-based-methods. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 10, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.419625Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, IL: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17, 510–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tankersley, M., Harjusola-Webb, S., & Landrum, T. L. (2008). Using single-subject research to establish the evidence base of special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208321600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolery, M., Dunlap, G., & Ledford, J. R. (2011). Single-case experimental methods: Suggestions for reporting. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111418235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar