Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:37:32.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Online Daily Behaviour Report Card to Decrease Off-Task Behaviour for Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2018

Wendy Yeo ,
Ailsa Goh  and
Carol Tan
Wendy Yeo
Affiliation:
National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Ailsa Goh*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Carol Tan
Affiliation:
National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
*
Correspondence: Ailsa Goh, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore, 637616. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Facilitating the learning and engagement of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in any classroom can be challenging. In this study, we examined the use of online daily behaviour report card (DBRC) to decrease off-task behaviour in students with ADHD who were studying at a public school for at-risk youths in Singapore. Using a multiple baseline design across participants, the study involved 3 adolescents with ADHD who exhibited a high level of off-task behaviour and had received numerous office discipline referrals. Aside from the involvement of classroom teachers, the online DBRC intervention was modified to involve an additional school mentor who supported the parents in monitoring and guiding the students. Results indicated that the online DBRC intervention had been effective in decreasing off-task behaviour in the 3 students. Implications of findings and directions for future studies are discussed.

Keywords

ADHDDBRCat riskbehavioural interventionsingle-subject designs
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , December 2018 , pp. 143 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

* This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Michael Arthur-Kelly.

References

Antshel, K. M., Hargrave, T. M., Simonescu, M., Kaul, P., Hendricks, K., & Faraone, S. V. (2011). Advances in understanding and treating ADHD. BMC Medicine, 9, 1–12. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-72Google Scholar
Bailey, J. S., Wolf, M. M., & Phillips, E. L. (1970). Home-based reinforcement and the modification of pre-delinquents’ classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 223–233. doi:10.1901/jaba.1970.3-223Google Scholar
Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2007). Long-term school outcomes for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A population-based perspective. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 28, 265–273. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e31811ff87dGoogle Scholar
Burkwist, B. J., Mabee, W. S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1987). The effect of a daily report card system on inappropriate classroom verbalizations with a junior high school learning-disabled student. Techniques, 3, 265–272.Google Scholar
Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McDougal, J. L. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate? Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157–169. doi:10.1002/pits.10027Google Scholar
Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Sassu, K. A. (2006). Acceptability and reported use of daily behavior report cards among teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 174–182. doi:10.1177/10983007060080030601Google Scholar
Fabiano, G. A., & Pelham, W. E. Jr. (2003). Improving the effectiveness of behavioral classroom interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A case study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 122–128. doi:10.1177/106342660301100206Google Scholar
Fabiano, G. A., Vujnovic, R. K., Pelham, W. E., Waschbusch, D. A., Massetti, G. M., Pariseau, M. E., . . . Volker, M. (2010). Enhancing the effectiveness of special education programming for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using a daily report card. School Psychology Review, 39, 219–239.Google Scholar
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203Google Scholar
Iznardo, M., Rogers, M. A., Volpe, R. J., Labelle, P. R., & Robaey, P. (2017). The effectiveness of daily behavior report cards for children with ADHD: A meta-analysis. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054717734646Google Scholar
Jurbergs, N., Palcic, J., & Kelley, M. L. (2007). School-home notes with and without response cost: Increasing attention and academic performance in low-income children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 358–379. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.358Google Scholar
Jurbergs, N., Palcic, J. L., & Kelley, M. L. (2010). Daily behavior report cards with and without home-based consequences: Improving classroom behavior in low income, African American children with ADHD. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 32, 177–195. doi:10.1080/07317107.2010.500501Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, M. L., & McCain, A. P. (1995). Promoting academic performance in inattentive children: The relative efficacy of school-home notes with and without response cost. Behavior Modification, 19, 357–375. doi:10.1177/01454455950193006Google Scholar
LeBel, T. J., Chafouleas, S. M., Britner, P. A., & Simonsen, B. (2013). Use of a daily report card in an intervention package involving home-school communication to reduce disruptive behavior in preschoolers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 103–112. doi:10.1177/1098300712440451Google Scholar
Levine, E. S., & Anshel, D. J. (2011). “Nothing works!” A case study using cognitive-behavioral interventions to engage parents, educators, and children in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 297–306. doi:10.1002/pits.20554Google Scholar
Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191Google Scholar
Owens, J. S., Holdaway, A. S., Zoromski, A. K., Evans, S. W., Himawan, L. K., Girio-Herrera, E., & Murphy, C. E. (2012). Incremental benefits of a daily report card intervention over time for youth with disruptive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 43, 848–861. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.02.002Google Scholar
Pelham, W. E. Jr., & Fabiano, G. A. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 184–214. doi:10.1080/15374410701818681Google Scholar
Phillips, V. L., & Olson, L. (2013). Teachers connect with technology: Online tools build new pathways to collaboration. Journal of Staff Development, 34 (4), 34–37.Google Scholar
Pyle, K., & Fabiano, G. A. (2017). Daily report card intervention and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of single-case studies. Exceptional Children, 83, 378–395. doi:10.1177/0014402917706370Google Scholar
Reid, R., Vasa, S. F., Maag, J. W., & Wright, G. (1994). An analysis of teachers’ perceptions of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 27, 195–202.Google Scholar
Robb, J. A., Sibley, M. H., Pelham, W. E. Jr., Foster, E. M., Molina, B. S. G., Gnagy, E. M., & Kuriyan, A. B. (2011). The estimated annual cost of ADHD to the US education system. School Mental Health, 3, 169–177. doi:10.1007/s12310-011-9057-6Google Scholar
Sibley, M. H., Pelham, W. E. Jr., Molina, B. S. G., Gnagy, E. M., Waschbusch, D. A., Garefino, A. C., . . . Karch, K. M. (2012). Diagnosing ADHD in adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 139–150. doi:10.1037/a0026577Google Scholar
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 339–355. doi:10.1177/0022487111404241Google Scholar
Vannest, K. J., Burke, M. D., Payne, T. E., Davis, C. R., & Soares, D. A. (2011). Electronic progress monitoring of IEP goals and objectives. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43 (5), 40–51. doi:10.1177/004005991104300504Google Scholar
Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., Davis, C. R., Mason, B. A., & Burke, M. D. (2010). Effective intervention for behavior with a daily behavior report card: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 39, 654–672.Google Scholar
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2017). What Works Clearinghouse: Standards handbook (Version 4.0). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
Williams, K. L., Noell, G. H., Jones, B. A., & Gansle, K. A. (2012). Modifying students’ classroom behaviors using an electronic daily behavior report card. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 34, 269–289. doi:10.1080/07317107.2012.732844Google Scholar
Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. Advances in School Psychology, 4, 251–288.Google Scholar
Zentall, S. S., & Javorsky, J. (2007). Professional development for teachers of students with ADHD and characteristics of ADHD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 78–93. doi:10.1177/019874290703200202Google Scholar
Zhang, D., Hsu, H.-Y., Kwok, O., Benz, M., & Bowman-Perrott, L. (2011). The impact of basic-level parent engagements on student achievement: Patterns associated with race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 28–39. doi:10.1177/1044207310394447Google Scholar