Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:54:38.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VAR-BASED OPTIMAL PARTIAL HEDGING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2013

Jianfa Cong ,
Ken Seng Tan  and
Chengguo Weng
Jianfa Cong
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, ON, Canada E-Mail: [email protected]
Ken Seng Tan*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, ON, Canada
Chengguo Weng
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, ON, Canada E-Mail: [email protected]
*
E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hedging is one of the most important topics in finance. When a financial market is complete, every contingent claim can be hedged perfectly to eliminate any potential future obligations. When the financial market is incomplete, the investor may eliminate his risk exposure by superhedging. In practice, both hedging strategies are not satisfactory due to their high implementation costs, which erode the chance of making any profit. A more practical and desirable strategy is to resort to the partial hedging, which hedges the future obligation only partially. The quantile hedging of Föllmer and Leukert (Finance and Stochastics, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 251–273), which maximizes the probability of a successful hedge for a given budget constraint, is an example of the partial hedging. Inspired by the principle underlying the partial hedging, this paper proposes a general partial hedging model by minimizing any desirable risk measure of the total risk exposure of an investor. By confining to the value-at-risk (VaR) measure, analytic optimal partial hedging strategies are derived. The optimal partial hedging strategy is either a knock-out call strategy or a bull call spread strategy, depending on the admissible classes of hedging strategies. Our proposed VaR-based partial hedging model has the advantage of its simplicity and robustness. The optimal hedging strategy is easy to determine. Furthermore, the structure of the optimal hedging strategy is independent of the assumed market model. This is in contrast to the quantile hedging, which is sensitive to the assumed model as well as the parameter values. Extensive numerical examples are provided to compare and contrast our proposed partial hedging to the quantile hedging.

Keywords

Quantile hedgingpartial hedgingoptimal strategyvalue-at-risk (VaR)bull call spreadknock-out call
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 271 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, S., Coleman, T.F. and Li, Y. (2004a) Derivative portfolio hedging based on CVaR. In Risk Measures for the 21st Century, pp. 339–363. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Alexander, S., Coleman, T.F. and Li, Y. (2004b) Minimizing CVaR and VaR for a portfolio of derivatives. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 583–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratyk, M. and Mishura, Y. (2008) The generalization of the quantile hedging problem for price process model involving finite number of Brownian and fractional Brownian motions. Theory of Stochastic Processes, 14 (30), 27–38.Google Scholar
Cai, J., Tan, K.S., Weng, C. and Zhang, Y. (2008) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43 (1), 185–196.Google Scholar
Chi, Y. and Tan, K.S. (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures. ASTIN Bulletin, 41 (2), 487–509.Google Scholar
Chi, Y. and Tan, K.S. (2013) Optimal reinsurance with general premium principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (2), 180–189.Google Scholar
Cong, J., Tan, K.S. and Weng, C. (2012) CVaR-based optimal partial hedging. Working Paper, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Cvitanić, J. (2000) Minimizing expected loss of hedging in incomplete and constrained markets. SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, 38, 1050–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaene, J., Denuit, M., Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R. and Vyncke, D. (2002) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31 (1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Föllmer, H. and Leukert, P. (1999) Quantile hedging. Finance and Stochastics, 3, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Föllmer, H. and Leukert, P. (2000) Efficient hedging: Cost versus shortfall risk. Finance and Stochastics, 4, 117–146.Google Scholar
Jorion, P. (2006) Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Klusik, P. and Palmowski, Z. (2011) Quantile hedging for equity-linked contracts. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48 (2), 280–286.Google Scholar
Krutchenko, R.N. and Melnikov, A.V. (2001) Quantile hedging for a jump-diffusion financial market model. In Trends in Mathematics, pp. 215–229. Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag.Google Scholar
Melnikov, A. and Skornyakova, V. (2005) Quantile hedging and its application to life insurance. Statistics and Decisions, 23 (4), 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnikov, A. and Smirnov, I. (2012) Dynamic hedging of conditional value-at-risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51 (1), 182–190.Google Scholar
Nakano, Y. (2004) Efficient hedging with coherent risk measure. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 293, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, Y. (2007) Minimizing coherent risk measures of shortfall in discrete-time models with cone constraints. Applied Mathematical Finance, 10 (2), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockafellar, R. and Uryasev, S. (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7), 1443–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudloff, B. (2007) Convex hedging in incomplete markets. Applied Mathematical Finance, 14 (5), 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekine, J. (2000) Quantile hedging for defaultable securities in an incomplete market. Mathematical Economics (Japanese), 1165, 215–231.Google Scholar
Sekine, J. (2004) Dynamic minimization of worst conditional expectation of shortfall. Mathematical Finance, 14 (4), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. and Cvitanić, J. (1999) Maximizing the probability of a perfect hedge. The Annuals of Applied Probability, 9 (4), 1303–1328.Google Scholar
Tan, K.S. and Weng, C. (2012) Enhancing insurer value using reinsurance and value-at-risk criterion. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 37, 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K.S., Weng, C. and Zhang, Y. (2011) Optimality of general reinsurance contracts under CTE risk measure. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 49 (2), 175–187.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2009) Quantile hedging for guaranteed minimum death benefits. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 45 (3), 449–458.Google Scholar