Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:25:33.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MODELLING ZERO-INFLATED COUNT DATA WITH A SPECIAL CASE OF THE GENERALISED POISSON DISTRIBUTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2019

Enrique Calderín-Ojeda ,
Emilio GóMez-Déniz  and
Inmaculada Barranco-Chamorro
Enrique Calderín-Ojeda
Affiliation:
Centre for Actuarial Studies, Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia E-Mail: [email protected]
Emilio GóMez-Déniz
Affiliation:
Department of Quantitative Methods and Institute of Tourism and, Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas, Spain, E-Mail: [email protected]
Inmaculada Barranco-Chamorro
Affiliation:
Facultad de Matemáticas. Department of Matematics and RO, University of Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain, E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A one-parameter version of the generalised Poisson distribution provided by Consul and Jain (1973) is considered in this paper. The distribution is unimodal with a zero vertex and over-dispersed. A generalised linear model related to this distribution is also presented. Its parameters can be estimated by using a Fisher-Scoring algorithm which is equivalent to iteratively reweighted least squares. Due to its flexibility and capacity to describe highly skewed data with an excessive number of zeros, the model is suitable to be applied in insurance settings as an alternative to the negative binomial and zero-inflated model.

Keywords

Zero-inflated count datageneralised linear modelsgeneralised Poisson distributionautomobile insurancefisher-scoring algorithmrandomised quantile residuals60E0562E9960J80
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 689 - 707
Copyright
© Astin Bulletin 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambagaspitiya, R. and Balakrishnan, N. (1994). On the compound generalized Poisson distributions. ASTIN Bulletin, 24, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P. (1989). Generalized Poisson Distributions. Properties and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Consul, P. and Famoye, F. (1992). Generalized Poisson regression model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 21, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P. and Jain, G. (1973). A generalization of the Poisson distribution. Technometrics, 15(4):791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, P. and Smyth, G. (1996). Randomized quantile residuals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 236–244.Google Scholar
Famoye, F. and Singh, K. (2006). Zero-inflated generalized Poisson regression model with an application to domestic violence data. Journal of Data Science, 4, 117–130.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, M. and Kaas, R. (1991). Evaluating compound generalized Poisson distributions recursively. ASTIN Bulletin, 21(2), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordy, M. (1998). Computationally convenient distributional assumptions for common-value auctions. Computational Economics, 12, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P., Gupta, R. and Tripathi, R. (1996). Analysis of zero-adjusted count data. Computational Statistical and Data Analysis, 23(2), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P., Gupta, R. and Tripathi, R. (1997). On the monotonic properties of discrete failure rates. Journal of Statistical Planning and inference, 65, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. Kemp, A. and Kotz, S. (2005). Univariate Discrete Distributions. New York: John Wiley, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlis, D. and Xekalaki, E. (2005). Mixed Poisson distributions. International Statistical Review, 73, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, B. (2000). Bounds on tail probabilities of discrete distributions. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 14, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klugman, S., Panjer, H. and Willmot, G. (2008). Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. Third Edition. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadarajah, S. (2005). Exponentiated beta distributions. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 49, 1029–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. (1996). Stochastic Processes. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Scollnik, D. (1998). On the analysis of the truncated generalized Poisson distribution using a Bayesian method. ASTIN Bulletin, 28, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Vernic, R. (1997). On the bivariate generalized Poisson distribution. ASTIN Bulletin, 27(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuong, Q. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non–nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. and Famoye, F. (1997). Modeling household fertility decisions with generalized Poisson regression. Journal of Population Economics, 10, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warde, W. and Katti, S. (1971). Infinite divisibility of discrete distributions ii. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 42(3), 1088–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmot, G. (1986). Mixed compound Poisson distributions. ASTIN Bulletin, 16, 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmot, G. (1989). Limiting tail behaviour of some discrete compound distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 8(3), 175–185.Google Scholar
Willmot, G. and Lin, X. (2000). Lundberg Approximations for Compound Distributions with Insurance Applications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar