Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:56:51.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The History of ASTIN. Invited Lecture at the 50 Years Anniversary of ASTIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Hans Bühlmann
Hans Bühlmann*
Affiliation:
ETH, Mathematik, CH-8092 Zürich, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“War is the father of all things”. This sentence of Heraklit (between 540 and 535 BC) has a lot of truth in general. I am quoting it in connection with World War II (1939-1945) and inventions originating in this period.

The best known examples of inventions (or first practical use of such invention) are

• Nuclear Fission leading to the construction of the atomic bomb and nuclear reactors,

• The Programmable Electronic Computer. Best known is the machine of John von Neumann as Los Alamos: Mathematical Analyser Numerical Integrator and Computer (MANIAC),

• Radar to guide the airplanes particularly at night and in bad weather conditions,

• Penicillin to fight bacteriological diseases.

Some of these inventions relied on original discoveries already made before the war, but during the war they were for the first time used on a large scale.

Type
Invited Historical Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 191 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2007

References

Ammeter, H. (1948) A Generalization of the Collective Theory of Risk in Regard to Fluctuating Basic Probabilities, Skandinarisk Aktuarik Tidshrift.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, R.E., Pentikäinen, T. and Personen, E. (1969) Risk Theory, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1960a) Reciprocal Reinsurance Treaties, ASTIN Bulletin, 1.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1960b) The Utility Concept Applied to the Theory of Insurance, ASTIN Bulletin, 1.Google Scholar
Cramér, H. (1930) On the Mathematical Theory of Risk, Skandia Jubilee Volume, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Cramér, H. (1955) Collective Risk Theory, a survey from the point of view of the theory of stochastic processes. Skandia Jubilee Volume, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Daykin, C.D., Pentikäinen, T. and Pesonen, M. (1994) Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1957) Su unimpostazione alternativa della teoria collettiva del rischio. Transactions XV Int. Congress of Actuaries, New York.Google Scholar
Dubey, A. (1974) Probabilité de ruine lorsque le parametre de Poisson est ajusté a posteriori, Mitteilungen Vereinigung Schweizer Versicherungsmathematiker, 2.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1973) Martingales in Risk Theory, Mitteilungen Vereinigung Schweizer Versicherungsmathematiker, 2.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1980) An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory, Huebner Foundation Monograph, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Henrici, P. (1979) Fast Fourier Methods in computational complex analysis, SIAM 21, 4.Google Scholar
Lundberg, F. (1909) Zur Theorie der Rückversicherung, Berichte des Internationalen Kongresses der Versicherungsmathematiker, Wien.Google Scholar
Lundberg, O. (1948) On Random Processes and Their Application to Sickness and Accident Statistics, University of Stockholm Thesis, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Panjer, H.H. (1980) The aggregate claims distributions and Stop Loss in reinsurance, Transactions Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Segerdahl, C.O. (1959) A Survey of Results in Collective Theory of Risk, Harald Cramér Volume, Stockholm and New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Whitney, A.W. (1918) The theory of experience rating. Proc. of Cas. Act. Soc. 4.Google Scholar