Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:06:19.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Functional Approach to Approximations for the Individual Risk Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Susan M. Pitts
Susan M. Pitts*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A functional approach is taken for the total claim amount distribution for the individual risk model. Various commonly used approximations for this distribution are considered, including the compound Poisson approximation, the compound binomial approximation, the compound negative binomial approximation and the normal approximation. These are shown to arise as zeroth order approximations in the functional set-up. By taking the derivative of the functional that maps the individual claim distributions onto the total claim amount distribution, new first order approximation formulae are obtained as refinements to the existing approximations. For particular choices of input, these new approximations are simple to calculate. Numerical examples, including the well-known Gerber portfolio, are considered. Corresponding approximations for stop-loss premiums are given.

Keywords

Total claim amount distributioncompound distributionsstop-loss premiumsFréchet derivatives
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , November 2004 , pp. 379 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2004

References

Cartan, H. (1971) Differential Calculus. Hermann, Paris and Kershaw, London. Google Scholar
Čekanavičius, V., and Wang, Y.H. (2003) Compound Poisson approximation for sums of discrete random variables. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 228–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. (2002) A comparison of possible methods for approximating aggregate claims probabilities of the individual risk model. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of Cambridge. Google Scholar
Cramér., H. (1930) On the mathematical theory of risk. Forsäkringtiebolaget Skandia 1855-1930, Parts I and II, Stockholm, 1930, 7–84, In Harald Cramér: Collected Works, Vol I, ed: Martin-Löf, A., Springer-Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
De Pril, N. (1986) On the exact computation of the aggregate claims distribution in the individual life model. ASTIN Bulletin 16, 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pril, N. (1989) The aggregate claims distribution in the individual model with arbitrary positive claims. ASTIN Bulletin 19, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pril, N., and Dhaene, J. (1992) Error bounds for compound Poisson approximations of the individual risk model. ASTIN Bulletin 22, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaene, J., and Sundt, B. (1997) On error bounds for approximations to aggregate claims distributions. ASTIN Bulletin 27, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunford, N. and Shwartz, J.T. (1958) Linear Operators: Part I, General Theory. Interscience, New York. Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Grübel, R. and Pitts, S.M. (1993) Some applications of the fast Fourier transform algorithm in insurance mathematics. Statistica Neerlandica 47, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1971) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Vol. 2, 2nd Ed. Wiley, New York. Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1979) An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, Philadelphia. Google Scholar
Grübel, R. (1989) Stochastic models as functionals: some remarks on the renewal case. J. Appl. Prob. 26, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grübel, R. and Pitts, S.M. (1992) A functional approach to the stationary waiting time and idle period distributions of the GI/G/1 queue. Ann. Probab. 20, 1754–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, C. (1986) Improved approximations for the aggregate claims distribution in the individual model. ASTIN Bulletin 16, 89–100.Google Scholar
Klugman, S.A, Panjer, H.H., and Willmot, G.E. (1998) Loss Models: from Data to Decisions. Wiley, New York. Google Scholar
Kornya, P.S. (1983) Distribution of aggregate claims in the individual risk theory model. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries 35, 823–836.Google Scholar
Kuon, S., Radtke, M., and Reich, A. (1993) An appropriate way to switch from the individual risk model to the collective one. ASTIN Bulletin 23, 23–54.Google Scholar
Panjer, H.H. (1981) Recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions. ASTIN Bulletin 12, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, S.M. (1998) A functional approach to approximations for the observed open times in single ion channels. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 219, 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, S.M. (1999) Approximations for semi-Markov single ion channel models. In Semi-Markov Models and Applications. eds Janssen, J. and Limnios, N., Kluwer, Dordrecht. 103–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, K. and Pitts, S.M. (1998) Approximations for the solutions of renewal-type equations. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 78, 195–216.Google Scholar
Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V., and Teugels, J. (1999) Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. Wiley, Chichester. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, W. (1986) Real and Complex Analysis. (3rd ed.) McGraw-Hill, New York. Google Scholar