Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:45:19.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Damaged Generalised Poisson Model and its Application to Reported and Unreported Accident Counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

David P.M. Scollnik
David P.M. Scollnik*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper investigates some models in which non-negative observations from a Poisson or generalised Poisson distribution are possibly damaged according to a binomial or quasi-binomial law. The latter case is appropriate when the observations are over-dispersed. Although the extent of the damage is not known, it is assumed that the event of whether or not damage occurred is discernible. The models are particularly suited for certain applications involving accident counts when evidence of certain accidents may be observed even though the accidents themselves may go unreported. Given the number of observed accidents and knowledge as to whether or not some additional accidents have gone unreported, these models may be used to make inferences concerning the actual number of unreported and total number of accidents in the current period, and the numbers of reported, unreported, and/or total accidents in a future period. The models are applied to a real data set giving reported and unreported patient accidents in a large hospital. Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation methods are presented and discussed.

Keywords

AccidentsBayesiandamageMarkov chain Monte Carlogeneralised Poissonquasi-binomialsurvival distributionunreported
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , November 2006 , pp. 463 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2006

References

Alzaid, A.A. and Al-Osh, M.A. (1993) Some Autoregressive Moving Average Processes with Generalized Poisson Marginal Distributions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 45, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambagaspitiya, R.S. (1998) Compound Bivariate Lagrangian Poisson Distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 23, 21–31.Google Scholar
Ambagaspitiya, R.S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1994) On the Compound Generalized Poisson Distributions. ASTIN Bulletin 24, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolstad, W.M. (2004) Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S.P. and Gelman, A. (1998) General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7, 434–455.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G. (2000) A Discussion of Parameter and Model Uncertainty in Insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 27, 313–330.Google Scholar
Charnet, R. and Gokhale, D.V. (2004) Statistical Inference for Damaged Poisson Distribution. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 33, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congdon, P. (2001) Bayesian Statistical Modelling. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Google Scholar
Congdon, P. (2003) Applied Bayesian Modelling. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P.C. (1974) A Simple Urn Model Dependent Upon Predetermined Strategy. Sankhya, Series B 36, 391–399.Google Scholar
Consul, P.C. (1975a) On a Characterization of Lagrangian Poisson and Quasi-Binomial Distributions. Communications in Statistics 4(6), 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P.C. (1975b) Some New Characterizations of Discrete Lagrangian Distributions. Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work, Volume 3, pages 279–290. Patil, G.B., et alia (editors). Hingham: D. Reidel Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Consul, P.C. (1989) Generalized Poisson Distributions: Properties and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Consul, P.C. (1990) On Some Properties and Applications of Quasi-Binomial Distribution. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 19(2), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P.C. and Famoye, F. (1989) The Truncated Generalized Poisson Distribution and its Estimation. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 18(10), 3635–3648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P.C. and Mittal, S.P. (1975) A New Urn Model with Predetermined Strategy. Bio-metrical Journal 17, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P.C. and Mittal, S.P. (1977) Some Discrete Multinomial Probability Models with Predetermined Strategy. Biometrical Journal 19, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consul, P.C. and Shoukri, M.M. (1985) The Generalized Poisson Distribution When the Sample Mean is Larger than the Sample Variance. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 14, 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Famoye, F. and Consul, P.C. (1995) Bivariate Generalized Poisson Distribution with Some Applications. Metrika 42, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Famoye, F., Wulu, J.T. and Singh, K.P. (2004) On the Generalized Poisson Regression Model with an Application to Accident Data. Journal of Data Science 2, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S. and Rubin, D.B. (2004) Bayesian Data Analysis, Second edition. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Henze, N. and Klar, B. (1995) Bootstrap Based Goodness of Fit Tests for the Generalized Poisson Model. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 24(7), 1875–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (2004) Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, Second edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Krishnaji, N. (1974) Characterization of Some Discrete Distributions Based on a Damage Model. Sankhya, Series A 36, 204–213.Google Scholar
Makov, U.E. (2001) Principal Applications of Bayesian Methods in Actuarial Science: A Perspective. North American Actuarial Journal 5(4), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makov, U.E. Smith, A.F.M. and Liu, Y.-H. (1996) Bayesian Methods in Actuarial Science. The Statistician 45(4), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morocoima-Black, R., Chavarra, S. and Lucas, C. (2001) Selected Intersection Crash Analysis for 1993-1998. Champaign-Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study (CUUATS), Champaign County Regional Planning Commission.Google Scholar
Ntzoufras, I. and Dellaportas, P. (2002) Bayesian Modeling of Outstanding Liabilities Incorporating Claim Count Uncertainty (with discussion). North American Actuarial Journal 6(1), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ntzoufras, I., Katsis, A. and Karlis, D. (2005) Bayesian Assessment of the Distribution of Insurance Claim Counts Using Reversible Jump MCMC. North American Actuarial Journal 9(3), 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C.R. and Rubin, H. (1964) On a Characterization of the Poisson Distribution. Sankhya, Series A 26, 295–298.Google Scholar
Rao, C.R. (1965) On Discrete Distributions Arising Out of Methods of Ascertainment. Sankhya, Series A 27, 311–324.Google Scholar
Rao, M.B. and Shanbhag, D.N. (1982) Damage Models. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Volume 2, pages 262–265. Banks, D.L., Read, C.B. and Kotz, S. (editors).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. and Young, V.R. (1999) A Bayesian Approach to Understanding Time Series Data. North American Actuarial Journal 3(2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollnik, D.P.M. (1995a) Bayesian Analysis of Generalized Poisson Models for Claim Frequency Data Utilising Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods. Actuarial Research Clearing House 1995.1, 339–356.Google Scholar
Scollnik, D.P.M. (1995b) Bayesian Analysis of Two Overdispersed Poisson Models. Biometrics 51, 1117–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollnik, D.P.M. (1998) On the Analysis of the Truncated Generalized Poisson Distribution Using a Bayesian Method. ASTIN Bulletin 28(1), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollnik, D.P.M. (2001) Actuarial Modeling with MCMC and BUGS. North American Actuarial Journal 5(2), 96–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., Carlin, B.P. and Van Der Linde, A. (2002) Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology 64, 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G. and Gilks, W.R. (1996) BUGS: Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G. and Lunn, D. (2004) WinBUGS User Manual: Version 2.0, June 2004. Available at mathstat.helsinki.fi/openbugs.Google Scholar
Srivastava, R.C. and Srivastava, A.B.L. (1970) On a Characterization of Poisson distribution. Journal of Applied Probability 7, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J., Standen, P. and Wallace, A. (1994) Unreported accidents to patients in hospital. Nursing Times 90 (39), 46–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Venables, W.N., Smith, D.M. and the R Development Core Team (2005) An Introduction to R, Notes on R: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, Version 2.1.1 (2005-06-20). Available at cran.r-project.org/manuals.html.Google Scholar
Vernic, R. (1997) On the Bivariate Generalized Poisson Distribution. ASTIN Bulletin 27, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernic, R. (2000) A Multivariate Generalization of the Generalized Poisson Distribution. ASTIN Bulletin 30, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrall, R.J. (2004) A Bayesian Generalized Linear Model for the Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method of Claims Reserving. North American Actuarial Journal 8(3), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar