Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:59:35.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bonus-Malus Systems: “Lack of Transparency” and Adequacy Measure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Paola Verico
Paola Verico*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Attuariali e Finanziarie, via Nomentana, 41 00161 – Roma, Italia, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Based on a recent contribution by Baione and others in this Journal, some consequences of the decrease of the mean merit coefficient for portfolios of Bonus-Malus policies, and some alternative ways to measure the “quality” of a Bonus-Malus system are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , November 2002 , pp. 315 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2002

References

Baione, E., Levantesi, S. and Menzietti, M. (2002) The Development of an Optimal Bonus-Malus System in a Competitive Market, ASTIN Bulletin 32, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, J. (1995) Bonus-Malus Systems in Automobile Insurance, Kluwer Academic Publ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verico, P. (2000) Sistemi Bonus-malus: trasparenza, equita ed un nuovo approccio per lo studio; Publ. of the Dept. for Act. and Fin. Sc., University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 16.Google Scholar