Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:42:40.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the Compound Poisson Surplus Model with Liquid Reserves, Interest and Dividends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Jun Cai ,
Runhuan Feng  and
Gordon E. Willmot
Jun Cai
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaN2L 3G1, E-Mail: [email protected]
Runhuan Feng
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA, P.O.Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, USA 53202-0413, E-Mail: [email protected]
Gordon E. Willmot
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaN2L 3G1, E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper incorporates liquid reserves, interest and dividends in the compound Poisson surplus model. When an insurer's surplus is below a certain level, it is kept as liquid reserves. As the surplus attains the level, the excess of the surplus above the level will earn interest at a constant interest rate. If the surplus continues to surpass a higher level, the excess of the surplus above this higher level will be paid out as dividends to the insurer's shareholders at a constant dividend rate or by the threshold strategy. The lower and higher levels are called the liquid reserve level and the threshold level, respectively.

This paper is to discuss the interactions of the liquid reserve level, the interest rate, the threshold level, and the dividend rate in the proposed risk model by studying the expected discounted penalty function and the expected present value of dividends paid up to the time of ruin. We derive expressions for the solutions to both quantities via the approach of integro-differential equation systems. We show that the dividend-penalty identity (Gerber et al. 2006, ASTIN Bulletin) still holds for the threshold strategy with liquid reserves and interest. We illustrate these results by deriving explicit solutions to the probability of ultimate ruin under the threshold strategy when claim sizes are exponentially distributed. In the end, we also discuss the impact of the liquid reserve level, the interest rate, the threshold level, and the dividend rate on the ruin probability by numerical examples.

Keywords

Liquid reservethreshold strategybarrier strategydiscounted penalty functiondividends paid up to ruindividend-penalty identityruin probability
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 225 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bühlmann, H. (1970) Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cai, J. and Dickson, D.C.M. (2002) On the expected discounted penalty function at ruin of a surplus process with interest, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 30: 389–404.Google Scholar
Cai, J., Feng, R. and Willmot, G.E. (2009) The compound Poisson surplus model with interest and liquid reserves: analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function, Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, in press.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P. and Schmidli, H. (1994) Ruin estimation for a general insurance risk model, Advances in Applied Probability 26: 404–422.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U., Lin, X.S. and Yang, H. (2006) A note on the dividend-penalty identity and the optimal dividend barrier, ASTIN Bulletin 36(2): 489–503.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. and Shiu, E.S.W. (1998) On the time value of ruin, North American Actuarial Journal 2(1): 48–78.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. and Shiu, E.S.W. (2005) The time value of ruin in a Sparre Andersen model, North American Actuarial Journal 9(2): 49–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, H.U. and Shiu, E.S.W. (2006) On optimal dividend strategies in the compound Poisson model, North American Actuarial Journal 10(2): 76–93.Google Scholar
Li, S. and Garrido, J. (2004) On ruin for the Erlang(n) risk process, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 34: 391–408.Google Scholar
Lin, X.S. and Pavlova, K.P. (2006) The compound Poisson risk model with a threshold dividend strategy, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 38: 57–80.Google Scholar
Lin, X.S., Willmot, G.E. and Drekic, S. (2003) The classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier: analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 33: 551–566.Google Scholar
Lin, X.S. and Sendova, K.P. (2007) The compound Poisson risk model with multiple thresholds, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42(2): 617–627.Google Scholar
Linz, P. (1985) Analytical and Numerical Methods for Volterra Equations. Studies 7, SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sundt, B. and Teugels, J.L. (1995) Ruin estimates under interest force, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 16: 7–22.Google Scholar
Yuen, K.C., Wang, G. and Wai, K.L. (2007) The Gerber-Shiu expected discounted penalty function for risk processes with interest and a constant dividend barrier, Insurance Mathematics and Economics 40(11): 104–112.Google Scholar