Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:58:52.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tail Comonotonicity and Conservative Risk Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Lei Hua  and
Harry Joe
Harry Joe
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T1Z4, E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tail comonotonicity, or asymptotic full dependence, is proposed as a reasonable conservative dependence structure for modeling dependent risks. Some sufficient conditions have been obtained to justify the conservativity of tail comonotonicity. Simulation studies also suggest that, by using tail comonotonicity, one does not lose too much accuracy but gain reasonable conservative risk measures, especially when considering high scenario risks. A copula model with tail comonotonicity is applied to an auto insurance dataset. Particular models for tail comonotonicity for loss data can be based on the BB2 and BB3 copula families and their multivariate extensions.

Keywords

Dependence modelingcopulaArchimedean copulaasymptotic full dependenceconditional tail expectationLaplace transformregular variation
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , November 2012 , pp. 601 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bingham, N.H., Goldie, C.M. and Teugels, J.L. (1987) Regular Variation, volume 27 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Box, G. and Draper, N. (1987) Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brechmann, E.C., Czado, C. and Aas, K. (2012) Truncated regular vines in high dimensions with application to financial data. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 40(1), 68–85.Google Scholar
Charpentier, A. and Segers, J. (2009) Tails of multivariate Archimedean copulas. Journal of Multi-variate Analysis, 100(7), 1521–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, K.C. (2009) Upper comonotonicity. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 45(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
Cooke, R., Kousky, C. and Joe, H. (2011) Micro correlations and tail dependence. In Kurowicka, D. and Joe, H., editors, Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook, chapter 5, pages 89–112. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore (2011).Google Scholar
de Haan, L. and Stadtmüller, U. (1996) Generalized regular variation of second order. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 61(03), 381–395.Google Scholar
Degen, M., Lambrigger, D.D. and Segers, J. (2010) Risk concentration and diversification: second-order properties. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46(3), 541–546.Google Scholar
Denuit, M., Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M. and Kaas, R. (2005) Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks. Wiley, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaene, J., Denuit, M., Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R. and Vyncke, D. (2002a) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Dhaene, J., Denuit, M., Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R. and Vyncke, D. (2002b) The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(2), 133–161.Google Scholar
Dong, J., Cheung, K. and Yang, H. (2010) Upper comonotonicity and convex upper bounds for sums of random variables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47(2), 159–166.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. and Mikosch, T. (1997) Modelling Extremal Events, volume 33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P., Lambrigger, D. and Wüthrich, M. (2009) Multivariate extremes and the aggregation of dependent risks: examples and counter-examples. Extremes, 12(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
Frees, E.W. and Valdez, E.A. (1998) Understanding relationships using copulas. North American Actuarial Journal, 2(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Genest, C. and Favre, A.-C. (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12, 347–368.Google Scholar
Genest, C., Remillard, B. and Beaudoin, D. (2009) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44(2), 199–213.Google Scholar
Hua, L. and Joe, H. (2011a) Tail order and intermediate tail dependence of multivariate copulas. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102, 1454–1471.Google Scholar
Hua, L. and Joe, H. (2011b) Second order regular variation and conditional tail expectation of multiple risks. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 49, 537–546.Google Scholar
Hua, L. and Joe, H. (2012) Tail comonotonicity: properties, constructions, and asymptotic additivity of risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51, 492–503.Google Scholar
Joe, H. (1997) Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts, volume 73 of Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Joe, H. and Hu, T. (1996) Multivariate distributions from mixtures of max-infinitely divisible distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 57(2), 240–265.Google Scholar
Klugman, S.A. and Parsa, R. (1999) Fitting bivariate loss distributions with copulas. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 24(1–2), 139–148.Google Scholar
Landsman, Z. and Valdez, E. (2003) Tail conditional expectations for elliptical distributions. North American Actuarial Journal, 7(4), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A.W. and Olkin, I. (2007) Life Distributions. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
McNeil, A.J. and Nešlehová, J. (2009) Multivariate Archimedean copulas, d-monotone functions and l 1-norm symmetric distributions. Annals of Statistics, 37(5B), 3059–3097.Google Scholar
McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P. (2005) Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton Series in Finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Nam, H., Tang, Q. and Yang, F. (2011) Characterization of upper comonotonicity via tail convex order. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48(3), 368.Google Scholar
Nelsen, R.B. (2006) An Introduction to Copulas. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, second edition.Google Scholar
Patton, A. (2009) Copula-based models for financial time series. Handbook of Financial Time Series, pages 767–785.Google Scholar
Resnick, S.I. (2007) Heavy-tail Phenomena. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (2007) Stochastic Orders. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Sklar, A. (1959) Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris, 8, 229–231.Google Scholar
Zhu, L. and Li, H. (2012) Asymptotic analysis of multivariate tail conditional expectations. To appear in North American Actuarial Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar