Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:17:12.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Warming, Extreme Weather Events, and Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: A Market-Based Forward-Looking Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Carolyn W. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, California State University, Fullerton
Kian Guan Lim
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University, Singapore

Abstract

Global warming has more than doubled the likelihood of extreme weather events, e.g. the 2003 European heat wave, the growing intensity of rain and snow in the Northern Hemisphere, and the increasing risk of flooding in the United Kingdom. It has also induced an increasing number of deadly tropical cyclones with a continuing trend. Many individual meteorological dynamic simulations and statistical models are available for forecasting hurricanes but they neither forecast well hurricane intensity nor produce clear-cut consensus. We develop a novel hurricane forecasting model by straddling two seemingly unrelated disciplines — physical science and finance — based on the well known price discovery function of trading in financial markets. Traders of hurricane derivative contracts employ all available forecasting models, public or proprietary, to forecast hurricanes in order to make their pricing and trading decisions. By using transactional price changes of these contracts that continuously clear the market supply and demand as the predictor, and with calibration to extract the embedded hurricane information by developing hurricane futures and futures option pricing models, one can gain a forward-looking market-consensus forecast out of all of the individual forecasting models employed. Our model can forecast when a hurricane will make landfall, how destructive it will be, and how this destructive power will evolve from inception to landing. While the NHC (National Hurricane Center) blends 50 plus individual forecasting results for its consensus model forecasts using a subjective approach, our aggregate is market-based. Believing their proprietary forecasts are sufficiently different from our market-based forecasts, traders could also examine the discrepancy for a potential trading opportunity using hurricane derivatives. We also provide a real case analysis of Hurricane Irene in 2011 using our methodology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ané, T. and Geman, H. (2000) Order Flow, Transaction Clock, and Normality of Asset Returns, Journal of Finance, 55, 22592284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. (1976) The Pricing of Commodity Contracts, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 167179.Google Scholar
Chang, C.W., Chang, J.S.K. and Yu, M.T. (1996) Pricing catastrophe insurance futures call spreads: a randomized operational time approach, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 63, 599617.Google Scholar
Chang, C.W., Chang, J.S.K. and Lu, W. (2008) Pricing catastrophe options in discrete operational time, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43, 422430.Google Scholar
Chang, C.C., Lin, S.K. and Yu, M.T. (2011) Valuation of Catastrophe Equity Puts with Markov-Modulated Poisson Processes, forthcoming in The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(2), 447473.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A. and Rubinstein, M. (1979) Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach, Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229263.Google Scholar
Emanuel, K.A. (1987) The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate. Nature, 326, 483485.Google Scholar
Emanuel, K.A. (1988) The maximum intensity of hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 11431155.Google Scholar
Emanuel, K.A. (1995) The behavior of a simple hurricane model using a convective scheme based on subcloud-layer entropy equilibrium. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 39593968.Google Scholar
Emanuel, K., DesAutels, C. Holloway, C. and Korty, R. (2004) Environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 843858.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, K., Ravela, S., Vivant, E. and Risi, C. (2006) A Statistical-Deterministic Approach to Hurricane Risk Assessment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 299314. Online Supplement.Google Scholar
Emanuel, K.A. (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature, 436, 686688. Online supplement to this paper.Google Scholar
Emanuel, K. (2006) Climate and tropical cyclone activity: A new model downscaling approach. J. Climate, 19, 47974802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, K., Sundararajan, R. and Williams, J. (2008) Hurricanes and global warming: Results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 347367.Google Scholar
Free, M., Bister, M. and Emanuel, K. (2004) Potential intensity of tropical cyclones: Comparison of results from radiosonde and reanalysis data. J. Climate, 17, 17221727.Google Scholar
Geman, H. (2005) From Measure Changes to Time Changes in Asset Pricing, Journal of Banking & Finance 29, 27012722.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1984) Error Bounds for the Compound Poisson Approximation, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 3, 191194.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1988) Mathematical Fun with the Compound Binomial Process, ASTIN Bulletin 18, 161168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.F. and Litzenberger, R.H. (1988) Foundations for Financial Economics, New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.Google Scholar
Kelly, D.L., Letson, D., Nelson, F. and Nolan, D. (2009) Evolution of Subjective Hurricane Risk Perception: A Bayesian Approach, Working Paper, University of Miami Abess Center for Ecosystems Science and Policy.Google Scholar
Jaimungal, S. and Wang, T. (2006) Catastrophe Options with Stochastic Interest Rates and Compound Poisson Losses, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 469483.Google Scholar
Knutson, T.R. and Tuleya, R.E. (2004) Impact of CO2-Induced Warming on Simulated Hurricane Intensity and Precipitation: Sensitivity of the Choice of Climate Control and Convective Parameterization, Journal of Climate, 17, 34773495.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.P. and Yu, M.T. (2002) Pricing Default-Risky CAT Bonds with Moral Hazard and Basis Risk, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69, 2544.Google Scholar
Levi, C. and Partrat, C. (1991) Statistical Analysis of Natural Events in the United States, ASTIN Bulletin 21, 253276.Google Scholar
Luo, Z., Stephens, G.L., Emanuel, K.A., Vane, D.G., Tourville, N. and Haynes, J.M. (2008) On the use of CloudSat and MODIS data for estimating hurricane intensity. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Lett., 5, 1316.Google Scholar
Schiermeier, Q. (2011) Increased Flood Risk Linked to Global Warming, Nature, 470, 316.Google Scholar
Wu, Y.C. and Chung, S.L. (2010) Catastrophe Risk Management with Counterparty Risk using Alternative Instruments, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47(2), 234245.Google Scholar