Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:03:29.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Challenges of Teaching Comparative Law and Socio-Legal Studies at Indonesia's Law Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

Herlambang P WIRATRAMAN
Herlambang P WIRATRAMAN*
Affiliation:
Universitas Airlangga, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the role of legal research methodologies in the development of legal science and the creation of social change in Indonesia. Based on fieldwork conducted at Indonesian law schools between 2014 and 2016, this article reveals that legal research methods taught in Indonesia are starkly divided into normative-juridical and empirical-juridical approaches. Misunderstandings between adherents of these different schools of thought pose significant obstacles to the development of interdisciplinary approaches to law that span or go beyond the divide. Methodological conflicts resulting in the absence of socio-legal approaches in Indonesian law schools, coupled with outdated and limited source materials, limit the study of comparative law in Indonesia to the mere comparison of statutes and rules shorn of socio-political context. They also fail to instill awareness of the importance of considering social – on top of legal – impact in the context of Indonesia's complex and pluralist legal system.

Type
Article
Information
Asian Journal of Comparative Law , Volume 14 , Supplement S1 , October 2019 , pp. S229 - S244
Copyright
Copyright © National University of Singapore, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Lecturer at Constitutional Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga; Executive Director of Center of Human Rights Law Studies (HRLS) Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga. This article is based on a paper presented at the conferences entitled ‘The State of Comparative Law in Asia’ and ‘Teaching Comparative Law in Asia’ on 27 and 28 September 2017, organized by the Centre for Asian Legal Studies (CALS) Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore and the Asian Law Institute (ASLI).

References

1. Riles, Annelise, ‘Comparative Law and Socio-Legal Studies’ in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (OUP 2006)Google Scholar.

2. Friedman, Lawrence M, ‘The Law and Society Movement’ (1986) 38(3) Stanford Law Review 775, 777CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Stone, Ferdinand, ‘The End to Be Served by Comparative Law’ (1951) 25 Tulane Law Review 325, 332Google Scholar.

4. Zweigert, K and Kötz, H, An Introduction to Comparative Law (Weir, Tony tr, 3rd edn, OUP 1998) 31Google Scholar.

5. ibid 34.

6. Watson, Alan, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (University Press of Virginia 1974) 29–30Google Scholar.

7. Nelken, David, Comparing Legal Cultures (Dartmouth 1997)Google Scholar; Nelken, David and Feest, Johannes (eds), Adapting Legal Cultures (Hart Publishing 2001)Google Scholar; Nelken, David, Using Legal Culture (Wildy, Simmonds & Hill 2012)Google Scholar.

8. Nelken, David, Comparative Criminal Justice: Making Sense of Difference (Sage 2010)Google Scholar; Nelken, David, Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalisation (Ashgate 2011)Google Scholar.

9. Halliday, Terence C and Carruthers, Bruce G, ‘The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes’ (2007) 112 American Journal of Sociology 1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Nelken, David, ‘Transnational Legal Processes and the (Re)construction of the ‘Social’: The Case of Human Trafficking’ in Feenan, Dermot (ed), Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies (Palgrave Macmillan 2013)Google Scholar.

11. Putro, Widodo Dwi and Wiratraman, Herlambang P, ‘Penelitian Hukum: Antara yang Normatif dan Empiris [Legal Research: Between Normative and Empirical]’ (2015) 5 Digest Epistema 3Google Scholar.

12. ibid.

13. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum [Legal Research] (Kencana Prenada Media Group 2010) 93Google Scholar.

14. Samuel, Geoffrey, ‘Does One Need an Understanding of Methodology in Law before One Can Understand Methodology in Comparative Law?’ in Van Hoecke, Mark (ed), Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kinds of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (Hart Publishing 2011)Google Scholar.

15. Banakar, Reza, ‘Power, Culture and Method in Comparative Law’ (2009) 5 International Journal of Law in Context 69, 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Putro and Wiratraman (n 11).

17. The study in Putro and Wiratraman (n 11) raises three key questions. First, how should legal research methods used in higher education in Indonesia be mapped? Second, why have research methodology fossilized into ideology, and why is there a permanent schism between normative research methods and empirical research methods? Third, how can both research methods be propagated as valid methodologies and how can research methods beyond the two ‘empires’ be developed? The authors conducted fieldwork at several universities, including University of Syiah Kuala (Banda Aceh), University of Sumatera Utara (Medan), University of Indonesia (Jakarta), University of Padjadjaran (Bandung), Catholic University of Parahyangan (Bandung), Diponegoro University (Semarang), University of Gadjah Mada (Yogyakarta), University of Airlangga (Surabaya), University of Jember (Jember), University of Mataram (Mataram), University of Hasanuddin (Makassar), and University of Cendrawasih (Jayapura).

18. Bedner, Adriaan and others (eds), Kajian Sosio-Legal [Socio-Legal Studies] (Pustaka Larasan 2012)Google Scholar.

19. Koeswahyono, Imam (ed), Sosio-Legal: Bekal Pengantar dan Substansi Pendalaman [Socio-Legal: Introduction and Deepening Substance] (Intimedia 2014)Google Scholar.

20. Irianto, Sulistyowati (ed), Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi [Legal Research Method: Constellation and Reflection] (Yayasan Obor dan JHMP-FHUI 2009)Google Scholar.

21. Bedner, Adriaan, ‘Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions’ (2013) 5 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 253–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22. ibid.

23. Supreme Court of Indonesia, Decision No 574 K/Pid.Sus/2018 (delivered on 26 September 2018) on Government Prosecutor v Baiq Nuril Maknun.

24. Supreme Court of Indonesia, Regulation No 3 of 2017 on Guidelines on Handling Legal Cases for Women.

25. Hadjon, Philipus M, ‘Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik (Normatif) [Researching Dogmatic Legal Studies (Normative)]’ (1994) 6 Yuridika Law Journal 1Google Scholar.

26. Marzuki (n 13).

27. Otto, Jan Michiel, ‘Sharia and National Law in Indonesia’, in Otto, Jan Michiel (ed), Sharia Incorporated. A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems in Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present (Leiden University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28. Wheeler, Sally and Thomas, Phil A, ‘Socio-legal Studies’ in Hayton, David (ed), Law's Future(s): British Legal Developments in the 21st Century (Hart Publishing 2000) 271Google Scholar.

29. Örücü, Esin and Nelken, David (eds), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Hart Publishing 2007)Google Scholar.

30. Bedner and others (n 18).

31. Samuel, Geoffrey, ‘Is Law Really a Social Science? A View from Comparative Law’ (2008) 67 Cambridge Law Journal 288, 311CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32. ibid.

33. Interview with Peter Machmud Marzuki, Professor, Faculty of Law, Airlangga University (Surabaya, Indonesia, 13 August 2014).

34. Soekanto, Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum [Introduction to Legal Research] (Universitas Indonesia 1986)Google Scholar.

35. Interview with Peter Machmud Marzuki (n 33).

36. ibid.

37. ibid.

38. Interview with HP, a doctoral student from University of Jember (Jember, 12 April 2015).

39. From an interview as quoted in Putro and Wiratraman (n 11).

40. ibid.

41. Interview with Peter Machmud Marzuki (n 33).

42. ibid.

43. One such instructor is Iman Prihandono, Head of the International Law Department and teacher of comparative law at the Faculty of Law, Airlangga University. He received his PhD from Macquarie University Law School. He argues that data and the socio-legal approach are necessary to be considered in order to analyze law from its context. His writings on transnational human rights litigation have been cited by many scholars, and such writings actually adopted interdisciplinary studies of law. See Prihandono, Iman, ‘Barriers to Transnational Human Rights Litigation against Transnational Corporations (TNCs): The Need for Cooperation between Home and Host Countries’ (2011) 3 Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 89Google Scholar. Another instructor is Amira Paripurna, member of the Criminal Law Department and senior researcher at the Center for Human Rights Law Studies (HRLS) at the Faculty of Law, Airlangga University. She received her PhD from Washington University Law School. She also uses a multidisciplinary approach in analyzing law for both teaching and research. One of her latest articles exemplifies the use of this approach. See Paripurna, Amira, Indriani, Masitoh, and Widiati, Ekawestri P, ‘Implementation of Resolution no. 4/2016 of the ICPO-INTERPOL Concerning Biometric Data Sharing: Between Countermeasures Against Terrorist Foreign Fighters (FTFS) and Protection of the Privacy of Indonesian Citizens’ (2018) 5 Brawijaya Law Journal 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. From an interview as quoted in Putro and Wiratraman (n 11).

45. One of the works of Roscoe Pound that is representative of the concept of ‘law as a tool of social engineering’ is Social Control through Law (Yale University Press 1942)Google Scholar.

46. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, ‘Pemantapan Cita Hukum dan Asas-Asas Hukum Nasional di Masa Kini dan Masa Yang Akan Datang [Developing Legal Aims and Principles of National Law in the Present and Future]’ (1995) Special Edition (1) Majalah Hukum Nasional 91.

47. Wignyosoebroto, Soetandyo, ‘Mochtar Kusumaatmadja: Manusia yang Pernah Saya Kenal dan Pemikirannya (Sebuah Pengantar Ringkas) [Mochtar Kusumaatmadja: The Man I Once Knew and His Thoughts (A Brief Introduction)]’ in Shidarta (ed), Mochtar Kusumaatmadja dan Teori Hukum Pembangunan [Mochtar Kusumaatmadja and Legal Theory of Development] (HuMa-Epistema 2012) vii-xxivGoogle Scholar.

48. ibid.

49. From an interview as quoted in Putro and Wiratraman (n 11).

50. Bedner and others (n 18).

51. From an interview as quoted in Putro and Wiratraman (n 11).

52. Bedner and others (n 18) 263–264.

53. Zweigert and Kötz (n 4) 34.

54. Galanter, Marc, ‘The Modernization of Law’ in Weiner, Myron (ed), Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth (Basic Books 1966) 154–56Google Scholar.

55. Wiratraman, Herlambang P and others, Hukum Rakyat [People's Law] (HuMa 2015)Google Scholar.

56. Creutzfeldt, Naomi, Kubal, Agniezka and Pirie, Fernanda, ‘Introduction: Exploring the Comparative in Socio-Legal Studies’ (2016) 12 International Journal of Law in Context 377, 379, 386CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57. Bedner and others (n 18).