Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T01:58:05.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards A Comparative Rhetoric of Argument: Using the Concept of “Audience” as a Means of Educating Students about Comparative Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2015

Helena Whalen-Bridge
Helena Whalen-Bridge*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Are Asian law schools adequately preparing law students to handle problems raised by cross-border disputes? Preparation has generally been limited to courses in conflicts of law, international law and comparative law, but the successful presentation of a legal position in a foreign legal system arguably requires more than an understanding of legal rules. Studies in legal culture suggest that participants in different legal systems think about the law in radically different ways. Comparative examples from the criminal justice systems of the United States and Japan demonstrate that some knowledge of a comparative rhetoric of argument - which arguments are appropriate in different legal systems - is required. Legal Writing Programmes can play a role in teaching comparative argument by expanding the concept of “audience” to include foreign legal systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Asian Journal of Comparative Law , Volume 1 , 2006 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the articles published in this volume.

2 See, e.g., Valcke, Catherine, “Global Law Teaching” (2004) 54 J. Legal Educ. 160 Google Scholar, and Glenn, H. Patrick, “Integrating Civil and Common Law Teaching Throughout the Curriculum: The Canadian Experience” (2002) 21 Penn. St. Int'l. L. Rev. 69 at 69–70 Google Scholar, where the author states that producing lawyers capable of thinking and working in terms of more than one national legal system, or more than one legal tradition, is the “major challenge” facing legal education in the 21st century.

3 See Ehrmann, Henry W., Comparative Legal Cultures (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976)Google Scholar, and Varga, Csaba, ed., Comparative Legal Cultures (Aldershot, England: Dartmouth, 1992)Google Scholar.

4 Ehrmann, supra note 4 at 9.

5 Friedman, Leon, “Legal Culture and Social Development” (1969) Law & Soc'y Rev. 6 at 19 Google Scholar.

6 Ehrmann, supra note 4 at 8, quoting Merryman, John Henry, The Civil Law Tradition (Stanford: Stanford University, 1969) at 2 Google Scholar.

7 Ibid.

8 Friedman, Lawrence M., “Are We A Litigious People?” in Friedman, Lawrence M. & Scheiber, Harry N., eds., Legal Culture and the Legal Profession (Bolder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1996) 53 Google Scholar.

9 Hall, Timothy S., “Legal Fictions and Moral Reasoning: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded Defendant after Penry v. Johnson” (2002) 35 Akron L. Rev. 327 at 355 Google Scholar.

10 The O.J. Simpson case was subject to extensive media coverage; the version utilised here is based on “The O.J. Simpson Case” online: The BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/simpsoncase.shtml. (22 November 2005)

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid.

13 “A Nation Divided?”, online: The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1583442,00.html?gusrc=rss (22 November 2005).

14 Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, “The Trouble with the Adversary System in a Post-Modern, MultiCultural World” (1996) 1 J. Inst. Stud. Leg. Eth. 49 at 66 Google Scholar.

15 Hall, supra note 10 at 355.

16 Ibid.

17 Ralston, Julie Yuki, “Geishas, Gays and Grunts: What the Exploitation of Asian Pacific Women Reveals About Military Culture and the Legal Ban on Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Service Members” (1998) 16 Law & Ineq. J. 661 Google Scholar.

18 Caron, Cathleen, “Whose Security is it? Military Violence Against Women During Peacetime” (1999) 6 Hum Rts. Br. 13 at 17 Google Scholar.

19 “Sailor Pleads Guilty in Okinawa Rape,” online: CNN http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9511/japan_rape/pm/ (22 November 2005).

20 Etsujiro, Miyagi, “Redressing the Okinawan Base Problem” (1996) 43 Japan Quarterly 27 Google Scholar.

21 Ibid. at 31.

22 Ibid.

23 Ibid.

24 Ibid. at 32.

25 Bugni, Toni M., “The Continued Invasion: Assessing the United States Military Presence of Okinawa through 1996” (1997) 21 Suffolk Transnt'l L. Rev. 85 Google Scholar.

26 Ibid. at 94, citing Military Base Affairs Office, Okinawa Prefectural Government, U.S. Military Bases in Okinawa: A Message from the Land of Courtesy (1994).

27 Ibid., citing Letter from Masahide Ota, Governor, Okinawa Prefecture, to William Jefferson Clinton, US President of the United States of America (November 4, 1995).

28 Caron, supra note 19 at 17.

29 Ibid.

30 “Marines Seek Peace with Okinawa in Rape Case”, The New York Times (8 October 1995) 1–3 Google ScholarPubMed.

31 Wagatsuma, Hiroshi & Rosett, Arthur, “The Implications of Apology: Law and Culture in Japan and the United States,” in Fujikura, Koichiro, ed., Japanese Law and Legal Theory (Aldershot, England: Dartmouth, 1996) 607 Google Scholar.

32 Ibid. at 618.

33 Ibid.

34 Ibid.

35 Ibid. at 627-628.

36 Ibid. at 608, citing Haley, John, “Sheathing the Sword of Justice in Japan: An Essay on Law without Sanctions” (1982) 8 J. Jap. Stud. 265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Ibid. at 609.

38 “One Pleads Guilty to Okinawan Rape, 2 Others Admit Role”, The New York Times (8 November 1995) A3 Google ScholarPubMed.

39 “3 Servicemen Convicted of Rape of Okinawan Girl”, The New York Times (7 March 1996) A10 Google ScholarPubMed.

40 “US Apologizes to Japan for Rape of 12-year-old in Okinawa”, The New York Times (2 November 1995) A7 Google ScholarPubMed.

41 Valcke, supra note 3 at 178-179.

42 See Tan, supra note 2.

43 Cook, Catriona et al., Laying Down the Law (Australia: Butterworths, 2001) at 366 Google Scholar; Squires, Lynn B. et al., Legal Writing in a Nutshell (St. Paul, Minnesota: West, 1996) at 28 Google Scholar.

44 For texts on “plain writing” see, e.g., Adler, Mark, Clarity for Lawyers (London: Law Society, 1990)Google Scholar, and Melinkoff, David, Legal Writing: Sense and Nonsense (St Paul, Minnesota: West, 1982)Google Scholar.

45 Rylance, Paul, Legal Writing and Drafting (London: Blackstone Press, 1994) at 8 Google Scholar.

46 See Squires, supra note 44.

47 Teply, Larry L., Legal Writing, Analysis, and Oral Argument (St. Paul, Minnesota: West, 1990)Google Scholar.

48 Edelman, Diane Penneys, “It Began in Brooklyn: Expanding Boundaries for First-Year Law Students by Internationalizing the Legal Writing Curriculum” (2002) 27 Brooklyn J. Int'l L. 415 Google Scholar.

49 See Squires, supra note 44 at 246: “Too often law students and lawyers aim only at a reader's logical mind and forgetto consider the reader's emotions.”

50 See Valcke, supra note 3 at 177.

51 Ibid. at 168.

52 Ibid. at 169.

53 Ibid. at 177, where didactic teaching is defined as providing students with “an outside observer's description of the new thought processes.”

54 Ibid. at 170.