Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-zrtmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T04:31:19.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workers and Democracy: The Indonesian Labor Movement, 1949–1957

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Abstract

Dutch recognition of Indonesia's sovereignty in December 1949 ended the constraints of colonialism, invasion, and reoccupation. Unions were free to reorganize and workers were free to take collective action to improve their lot in life. A labor movement that had struggled against a repressive colonial regime now flourished. There was freedom of association, freedom of the press, electoral politics with universal suffrage, and above all, the right to engage in industrial action. Eight years later, hopes for a strong labor movement with deep roots in workplaces were dashed, first, by the imposition of military law and then, by the collapse of parliamentary democracy. It was not until Suharto's ‘New Order’ regime collapsed in 1998 that workers regained the freedom of association and to engage in collective action.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ingleson, John. 1986. In Search of Justice: Workers and Unions in Colonial Java, 1908–1926. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingleson, John. 2014. Workers, Unions and Politics: Indonesia in the 1920s and 1930s. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, Daniel S. 2005. ‘Memory, Knowledge and Reform.’ In Beginning to Remember: The Past in the Indonesian Present, edited by Zurbuchen, Mary S., 195208. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
McVey, Ruth T. 1994. ‘The Case of the Disappearing Decade.’ In Democracy in Indonesia:1950s and 1960s, edited by Bourchier, David and Legge, John, 315. Monash Papers on Southeast Asia 31. Melbourne: Monash Asia Institute, Monash University.Google Scholar