Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-sqlfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T18:57:56.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uncomfortable Questions in the Wake of Nuclear Accidents at Fukushima and Chernobyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty nuclear accidents at the official International Nuclear Event Scale of 4 to 7 have occurred between 1952 and 2011 (Lelieveld et al. 2012). The risk of another major accident during the next 50 years is high and it has been estimated that some 30 million people could be directly affected by such an accident (Lelieveld et al. 2012). The highest risks occur around major metropolises such as New York, Washington, Atlanta, Toronto, Western Europe, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Tokyo and Osaka. The lessons that have emerged from Chernobyl and Fukushima reveal a range of serious questions that must be answered appropriately, above all for the sake of citizens, but also for the credibility of the nuclear industry, and for framing the ongoing debate over energy alternatives. Because recent models suggest that more than half of released radioactive material from a nuclear disaster would be transported more than 1000 km from the site of release (Lelieveld et al. 2012), these questions are important even for citizens in distant countries. It is in this spirit that we have produced a list of unpleasant questions that have been a cause of concern since we first started conducting research at Chernobyl in 1992, and have grown in urgency since conducting research at Fukushima beginning in 2011.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

References

Dengler, L. and Smits, G. 2011. The Past Matters: Lessons from History and From Japan's March 11 Earthquake and Tsunami. The Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus (link).Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. T. 1993. Unchained reactions: Chernobyl, glasnost, and nuclear deterrence. University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Jobin, P. 2012. Fukushima One Year On: Nuclear workers and citizens at risk. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus (link).Google Scholar
Lelieveld, J., Kunkel, D. and Lawrence, M. G. 2012. Global risk of radioactive fallout after major nuclear reactor accidents. Atnos. Chem. Phys. 12: 42454258.Google Scholar
Møller, A.P., Hagiwara, A., Matsui, S., Kasahara, S., Kawatsu, K., Nishiumi, I., Suzuki, H., Ueda, K., and Mousseau, T.A.. 2012. Abundance of birds in Fukushima as judged from Chernobyl. Environmental PollutionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, A.P., Nishiumi, I., Suzuki, H., Ueda, K., and Mousseau, T.A.. 2013. Differences in effects of radiation on abundance of animals in Fukushima and Chernobyl. Ecological Indicators, 14: 7581. (link).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pararas-Carayannis, G. 2002. Evaluation of the threat of mega tsunami generation from postulated massive slope failures of islands stratovolcanoes on La Palma, Canary Islands, and on the island of Hawaii. Science of Tsunami Hazards 20: 251277.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, H. 2011. Braving Heat and Radiation for Temp Job. New York Times April 10, 2011.Google Scholar
Tickell, O. 2009. Toxic Link: The WHO and the IAEA. The Guardian 28 May 2009.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 2009. Deceit and self-deception. Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, R. 2013a. Fukushima Rescue Mission Lasting Legacy: Radioactive contamination of Nearly 70,000 American. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus Vol. 11, Issue 11, No. 4. March 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, R. 2013b. A Lasting Legacy of the Fukushima Rescue Mission: Cat and Mouse with a Nuclear Ghost. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, Vol. 11, Issue 12, No. 1. March 25, 2013.Google Scholar