Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T14:52:46.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taiwan and the Ryukyus (Okinawa) in Asia-Pacific Multilateral Relations - a Long-term Historical Perspective on Territorial Claims and Conflicts アジア太平洋地域の多国間関係における台湾と琉球諸島（沖縄）領土権主張や紛争を長期的視野でとらえる

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Lin Man-houng
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article summarizes relevant historical developments involving Taiwan and Okinawa in Asia-Pacific multilateral relations over the longue durée, and suggests future prospects.

1. Both Taiwan and the Ryukyus are within the Kuroshio (Black Tide) Current Civilization Zone (from approximately the beginning of the 3rd Century): At that time, crops such as cassava and yams traveled northbound with the Kuroshio Currents, which ran from the Philippines to Taiwan and the Ryukyus to Kyushu, while crops such as millet in northern parts of South East Asia traveled to Taiwan via the South Sea and further traveled to the Ryukyus and Kyushu. Together with the path of rice from south of China's Yangtze River via Korea to Kyushu, Japan these were two important sea-borne cultural exchange paths in the Asia-Pacific. However, by the 3rd Century, the direct route from south of the Yangzi to central Japan, as well as the Silk Road from Chang'an in Northwest China to Central Asia, and the shipping route from Guangzhou to India superseded the aforesaid routes. As a result, Taiwan and the Ryukyu Islands became isolated on the international stage for about one thousand years (Ts'ao, 1988).

Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 11 , Issue 21 , May 2013 , e5
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

References

Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Republic of China (AMOA), collected in the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Deng, Kaisong, Houru, Xie. (1999). History and social development of Macao (in Chinese). Zhuhai□Zhuhai Press.Google Scholar
Du, Hengzhi. (2012) “A Proposal Concerning the Lawful Recovery of the Diaoyutai Islets” (in Chinese), originally printed in 1971, reprinted in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Republic of China (ROC) (2012). Sovereignty belonging to us - the significance of the 60th anniversary of the Taipei Treaty (in Chinese). Taipei: MOFA, ROC, pp. 70–73.Google Scholar
Guoshiguan(Academia Historica). (1999). Key events of the Republic of China (in Chinese), the year 1952. Taipei: zhongyang wenwu gongyingshe.Google Scholar
Hamakawa, Kyoko. (2007). “Views from Japan and China on the sovereignty of the Senkaku islands (in Japanese).” Issue Brief (February 28), no. 565. Tokyo: the Library of Congress. (Accessed January 30, 2013), pp. 8, 10.Google Scholar
Hara, Kimie. (2006). Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided Territories in the San Francisco System. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Japan Center for Asian Historical Records: National Archives of JapanGoogle Scholar
Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO)'s website.Google Scholar
Kerr, George. (1992). Formosa Betrayed. Upland: Taiwan Publishing Co., 1992.Google Scholar
Ju, Deyuan. (2011). On the sovereignty of the Diaoyutai Islets (in Chinese). Beijing: Shoudu shifan daxue press.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, L., Oppenheimer, H. (1967) International Law. 2 vols. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Liang, Huahuang. (1974). “The background of and motivations for Japan's annexation of Taiwan(in Chinese).” History Bulletin of National Chenggong University, No. 1: 139–164.Google Scholar
Lin, Man-houng. (2006a). China Upside Down: Currency, Society, and Ideologies, 1808-1856. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Man-houng. (2006b). “Book Review on Akamine Mamoru, Ryukyu Kingdom (Pingjie Chilingshou, Liuqiu wangguo),” Modern History Bulletin. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lin, Man-houng. (2006c). “Ryukyu and Taiwan on the East Asian Seas”, Japan Focus (referred e-journal).Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Republic of China (ROC) (2012). Sovereignty belonging to us - the significance of the 60th anniversary of the Taipei Treaty (in Chinese). Taipei: MOFA, ROC.Google Scholar
Niksch, Larry A. (1996), “Senkaku(Diaoyu) Islands Dispute: The U.S. Legal Relationship and Obligations,” Congressional Research Service (CRS)-96-798.Google Scholar
Okada, Takeshi. (2012). The Senkaku issue (in Japanese). Tokyo: Sososha.Google Scholar
Shao, Han-yi. (2012) “An analysis of the sovereignty of the Diaoyutai Islets (in Chinese), in Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Republic of China (ROC) (2012). Sovereignty belonging to us - the significance of the 60th anniversary of the Taipei Treaty (in Chinese). Taipei: MOFA, ROC, pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
Suganuma, Uuryu. (2007). History of Sino- Japanese Relations: Sovereignty and Territory (in Chinese). Tokyo: Nihon Kyoho.Google Scholar
Ts'ao, Yung-ho (Cao Yonghe). (1988). “Taiwan and Japan in the intercourse history around the China seas (in Japanese)’, in Kenji, Yanai Ed., International intercourse for the close-door Japan (in Japanese). Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan.Google Scholar
United Nations, United Nations Treaty Series, 1952.Google Scholar