Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T01:47:19.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Still a Negative Case? Japan's Changing Refugee Policy in the Face of New Geopolitical Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Maximilien Xavier Rehm
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite being a party to the Refugee Convention since 1981, Japan has historically admitted very few asylum seekers. However, recently the country's total protection rate has increased, from 2.3% in 2020 to 52% in 2022. This article explores this seemingly dramatic shift in Japan's refugee policy, tying the increased rate of asylum admissions to the country's broader foreign policy in the face of recent geopolitical challenges in Myanmar, Afghanistan, and Ukraine, while outlining the diverging pathways of admission utilized in each case.

Keywords

Japanese Refugee PolicyJapanese Foreign PolicyNegative Cases
Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , June 2024 , e2
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2024

References

Akashi, Junichi. 2006. “Challenging Japan's Refugee Policies.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 15 (2): 219–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719680601500203.Google Scholar
Takuya, Asakura. 2023. “元大使館職員のアフガン 難民、日本で困窮 ウクライナと支援に差 (Afghan Refugees That Were Former Japanese Embassy Staff Report Economic Hardship in Japan).” Asahi Shimbun, October 6. https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASRB6721SR9TPTIL00S.html?iref=ogimage_rek.Google Scholar
Ashizawa, Kuniko. 2014. “Japanese Assistance in Afghanistan: Helping the United States, Acting Globally, and Making a Friend.” Asia Policy 17 (1): 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barno, Suyunova. 2024. “Japan's Participation in the Reconstruction of Afghanistan.” American Journal of Public Diplomacy and International Studies 2 (3): 115–22.Google Scholar
Bartram, David. 2000. “Japan and Labor Migration: Theoretical and Methodological Implications of Negative Cases.” International Migration Review 34 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791830003400101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James D. J. 2023. “The China Factor: Explaining Japan's Stance on Russia's Invasion of Ukraine.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, February 28. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/89156.Google Scholar
Cabinet Public Affairs Office. 2023. “Japan Stands With Ukraine: Most Recent Measures As of October 19, 2023.” https://japan.kantei.go.jp/ongoingtopics/pdf/jp_stands_with_ukraine_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. 2024. “Aktuelle Zahlen Ausgabe: Dezember 2023 (Current Statistics for December 2023).” https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Statistik/AsylinZahlen/aktuelle-zahlen-dezember-2023.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Karl, Hagström, Linus, and Hanssen, Ulv. 2018. “Japan's Pacifism Is Dead.” Survival 60 (6). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00396338.2018.1542803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havens, Thomas R.H. 1990. “Japan's Response to the Indochinese Refugee Crisis.” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 18 (1): 166–81.Google Scholar
Hein, Pat. 2023. “When Domestic Interests and Norms Undermine the Rules-Based Order: Reassessing Japan's Attitude toward International Law.” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 8 (4): 895–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231168206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Office. 2024. “How Many People Do We Grant Protection To?” February 29. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-system-statistics-year-ending-december-2023/how-many-people-do-we-grant-protection-to.Google Scholar
Hong, Zhao. 2014. “Japan and China: Competing for Good Relations with Myanmar.” The Journal of East Asian Affairs 28 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2018. “平成29年における難民認 定者数等について (The Admission of Asylum Seekers in 2017).” https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/content/930003622.pdf.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2022a. “Zairyū Gaikokujin Tōkei 2021 Nen 12 Gatsu (Foreign Resident Statistics as of December 2021).” https://www.e-stat.go.jp/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00250012&tstat=000001018034&cycle=1&year=20210&month=24101212&tclass1=000001060399&tclass2val=0.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2022b. “本国情勢を踏まえた在留ミャンマ ー人への緊急避難措置（改訂） (Emergency Measures for Citizens of Myanmar Considering the Situation in Their Home Country (Revised)).” https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/content/001349360.pdf.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2023a. “平成29年における難民認 定者数等について (The Admission of Asylum Seekers in 2022).” https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/content/001393012.pdf.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2023b. “本国情勢を踏まえた在留ミャンマ ー人への緊急避難措置（改訂） (The Admission of Asylum Seekers to Our Country).” https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/content/001393014.pdf.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2023c. “補完的保護対象者認定制度 (The System of Complimentary Protection).” December 2023. https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/refugee/procedures/07_00037.html.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2023d. “難民該当性判断の手引 (Guidelines For Granting Refugee Status).” https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/content/001393172.pdf.Google Scholar
Immigration Services Agency of Japan, Ministry of Justice. 2024. “ウクライナ避難民の受入れ・支援等 の状況について (Current Status of Admission and Support for Ukrainian Evacuees).” https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/content/001388202.pdf.Google Scholar
Justice for Myanmar. 2023. “Statement Calling on the Japanese Government to Stop ODA and Publicly-Funded Projects Benefiting the Myanmar Military | Justice For Myanmar.” December 1. https://www.justiceformyanmar.org/press-releases/statement-calling-on-the-japanese-government-to-stop-oda-and-publicly-funded-projects-benefiting-the-myanmar-military.Google Scholar
Kalicki, Konrad. 2019. “Japan's Liberal-Democratic Paradox of Refugee Admission.” Journal of Asian Studies 78 (2): 355–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911819000093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiel Institute for the World Economy. 2024. “Total Aid with Refugee Costs (Ukraine Support Tracker).” January. https://app. 23degrees.io/view/jjk5qrNvY6pVz7qm-bar-horizontal-bar_chart_rf_total. Ministry of Defense. 2023. “Defense of Japan 2023.” https://www.mod.go.jp/en/publ/w_paper/wp2023/DOJ2023_EN_Full.pdf.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. 2024. “Japan-Ukraine Conference for Promotion of Economic Growth and Reconstruction.” February 19. https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/c_see/ua/pageite_000001_00169.html.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2012. “インドシナ難民の定住 許可に関する閣議了解の推移 (Successive Cabinet Approvals for Admitting Indochinese Refugees).” Cabinet Secretariat. https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/nanmin/yusikishakaigi/dai4/siryou2.pdf.Google Scholar
National Diet Library. 2021. “第204回国会衆議 院予算委員会第4号令和3年2月4日 (The 204th Session of the National Diet, Budget Committee of the House of Representatives, No. 4, February 4th 2021).” https://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/#/detail?minId=120405261X00420210204&current=6.Google Scholar
National Diet Library. 2022a. “第208回国会参議院予算委員会 第3号令和4年2月25日 (The 208th Session of the National Diet, Budget Committee of the House of Councilors, No. 3, February 25th 2022).” https://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/#/detail?minId=120815261X00320220225&spkNum=5&current=159.Google Scholar
National Diet Library. 2022b. “第208回国会参議院法務委員会 第7号令和4年4月19日 (The 208th Session of the National Diet, House of Councillors Committee on Judicial Affairs No. 7, April 19th 2022).” https://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/#/detail?minId=120815206X00720220419&current=11.Google Scholar
National Diet Library. 2022c. “第210回国会衆議院法務委 員会第2号令和4年10月26日 (The 210th Session of the National Diet, House of Representatives Committee on Judicial Affairs No. 2, October 26th 2022).” https://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/#/detail?minId=121005206X00220221026&spkNum=173&current=23.Google Scholar
NHK News. 2023. “アフガニスタンから日本に避 難の114人 新たに難民認定 (114 Afghan Citizens Recognized as Refugees in Japan),” July 12. https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230712/k10014127231000.html.Google Scholar
Pressello, Andrea. 2023. “Japan's Peace Diplomacy on the Vietnam War and the 1968-1969 Shift in the United States' Asia Policy.” Japanese Studies 43 (1): 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2023.2199355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters. 2021. “Japan Defence Official Warns Myanmar Coup Could Increase China's Influence in Region.” February 2, sec. World. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2A20PX/.Google Scholar
Seekins, Donald M. 2015. “Japan's Development Ambitions for Myanmar: The Problem of ‘Economics before Politics.’” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 34 (2): 113–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341503400205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigeki, Sumi. 2022. “Japan's Role in Ukraine from 2014-2019.” Asia-Pacific Review 29 (2): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2022.2105514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Bhubhindar. 2024. “Front-Line Guardian of the Status Quo: Japan under the Kishida Government.” International Affairs 100 (3): 1287–1301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan. 2023. “【 意見】 2023 年入管法案に対する意見 (Opinion on the 2023 Amendment to the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act).” March 14. https://migrants.jp/news/voice/20230314.html.Google Scholar
Strausz, Michael. 2012. “International Pressure and Domestic Precedent: Japan's Resettlement of Indochinese Refugees.” Asian Journal of Political Science 20 (3): 244–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2012.748966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, Nobuhiko. 2023. “In Major Shift, Japan Gives Nod to Exports of Lethal Weapons.” Asahi Shimbun, December 23. https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15093193.Google Scholar
Tarumoto, Hideki. 2019. “Why Restrictive Refugee Policy Can Be Retained? A Japanese Case.” Migration and Development 8 (1): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2018.1482642.Google Scholar
UNHCR Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific. 2024a. “Afghanistan: Situation Update #32.” https://reporting.unhcr.org/afghanistan-situation-update-32.Google Scholar
UNHCR Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific. 2024b. “Myanmar Emergency - UNHCR Regional Update - 5 February 2024.” https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/106848.Google Scholar
UNHCR Regional Bureau for Europe. 2024. “Ukraine Situation Flash Update #66.” https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/107210.Google Scholar
Wolman, Andrew. 2015. “Japan and International Refugee Protection Norms: Explaining Non-Compliance.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 24 (4): 409–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196815606852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. n.d. “Refugee Population by Country or Territory of Asylum - Canada, United Kingdom, United States, France, Italy, Germany, Japan.”Google Scholar
World Bank Open Data. Accessed June 14, 2024. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.REFG?end=2022&locations=CA-GB-US-FR-IT-DE-JP&start=2022&view=bar.Google Scholar