Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-7l9ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-12T03:17:41.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Determination in Oceania: New Roles for US, Japanese and Asian Power?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Terence Wesley-Smith
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The vast Pacific Islands region, or Oceania, has long been considered an “American lake,” its numerous small island states and territories heavily dependent on the United States and its western allies, particularly Australia, New Zealand, and France, for development assistance, trade, and security. However, economic and political ties with Asian states have become increasingly important in recent decades. Japan has been active in Oceania since the 1980s, motivated by its long-term interests in natural resources, particularly fisheries, as well cognizant of the “burden sharing” obligations of its strategic alliance with the United States. Japan is now the major aid donor to the region as a whole, and since 1997 has hosted regular, high-profile summit meetings with Pacific Island leaders. The substantial increase in aid announced by Prime Minister Koizumi at the most recent of these meetings, held in Okinawa in May 2006, was in part a response to mounting political instability in Oceania. It was also an attempt to counter China's growing interest in the region, signaled by Beijing's summit meeting with island leaders in Fiji the previous month, as well as Taiwan's ongoing and aggressive use of “dollar diplomacy” to win support from island states. This article discusses some key issues shaping the political environment in which this escalating strategic competition is taking place.

Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , February 2007 , e5
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007

References

ASPI, Australian Strategic Policy Institute 2003: Our Failing Neighbour: Australia and the Future of Solomon Islands. An ASPI Policy Report. Sydney: ASPI.Google Scholar
BENNETT, Judith 2000: Pacific Forest: A History of Resource Control and Contest in Solomon Islands, c. 1800-1997. Cambridge and Leiden: White Horse Press and Brill Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DINNEN, Sinclair 2004b: Lending a Fist? Australia's New Interventionism in the Southwest Pacific. Canberra: State, Society and Governance in Melanesia, Discussion Paper 2004/5.Google Scholar
DOBELL, Graeme 2005: “Australia's Intervention Policy: A Melanesian Learning Curve?” Paper prepared for Workshop on Intervention and State-Building in the Pacific, Department of International Relations, The Australian National University, 26-27 May.Google Scholar
DORNEY, Sean 1998: The Sandline Affair: Politics, Mercenaries and the Bougainville Crisis. Sydney: ABC Books.Google Scholar
DUARA, Prasenjit (ed.) 2004: Decolonization: Perspectives from Now and Then. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMERSON, Rupert 1960: From Empire to Nation: The Rise of Self-Assertion of Asian and African Peoples. Boston: Beacon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FININ, Gerard and WESLEY-SMITH, Terence 2001: “Coups, Conflicts, and Crises: The New Pacific Way?”, Race and Class 42(4): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIRTH, Stewart 1989: “Sovereignty and Independence in the Contemporary Pacific”, The Contemporary Pacific 1(1&2): 75–96.Google Scholar
FRY, Greg 2005: “The War on Terror and Australia's New Interventionism in the Pacific: Some Questions of Legitimacy”, paper prepared for Workshop on Intervention and State-Building in the Pacific, Department of International Relations, The Australian National University, 26-27 May.Google Scholar
HEGARTY, David, MAY, Ron, REGAN, Anthony, DINNEN, Sinclair, NELSON, Hank and DUNCAN, Ron 2004: Rebuilding State and Nation in Solomon Islands: Policy Options for the Regional Assistance Mission. Canberra: State, Society and Governance in Melanesia, Discussion Paper 2004/2.Google Scholar
HELD, David 2003 “The Changing Structure of International Law: Sovereignty Transformed?” in Held, David and McGrew, A. (eds.), The Global Transformation Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press, 162–176.Google Scholar
HENDERSON, John and WATSON, Greg 2005: “Introduction: Pacific Conflict—How Much and Why.” In Securing a Peaceful Pacific, edited by Henderson, John and Watson, Greg, 3–13. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.Google Scholar
HEZEL, Francis 1995: Strangers in Their Own Land: A Century of Colonial Rule in the Caroline and Marshall Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
HUGHES, Helen 2003: Aid has Failed the Pacific. Sydney: The Centre for Independent Studies, Issue Analysis #33.Google Scholar
ICISS, INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON INTERVENTION AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY 2001: The Responsibilty to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
KAPLAN, Robert 1994: “The Coming Anarchy”, The Atlantic Monthly 273(6), 13.Google Scholar
KELSEY, Jane 2004: “Big Brothers Behaving Badly: The Implications for the Pacific Islands of the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER)”, report commissioned by the Pacific Network on Globalisation, Suva, Fiji.Google Scholar
KELLY, J. D. and KAPLAN, M. 2004: “‘My ambition is much greater than independence’: US Power, the UN World, the Nation-state and their Critics. In Decolonization: Perspectives from Now and Then, edited by Duara, Prasenjit, 140–150. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MACDONALD, Barrie 1982: Cinderellas of Empire: Towards a History of Kiribati and Tuvalu. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
MILLIKEN, Jennifer (ed.) 2003: State Failure, Collapse and Reconstruction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
OTTAWAY, Marina and LACINA, Bethany 2003: “International Interventions and Imperialism: Lessons from the 1990s”, SAIS Review XXIII #2, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PARETI, Samisoni 2007: “Fiji:2007 Reconstruction Year,” Islands Business, January.Google Scholar
PATIENCE, Allan 2005: The ECP and Australia's Middle Power Ambitions. Canberra: The Australian National University, State, Society and Governance in Melanesia Discussion Paper 2005/4.Google Scholar
REGAN, Anthony 2002: “The Bougainville Political Settlement and the Prospects for Sustainable Peace”, Pacific Economic Bulletin 17(1): 114–129.Google Scholar
REGAN, Anthony 1998: “Current Developments in the Pacific: Causes and Course of the Bougainville Crisis”, Journal of Pacific History 33(3): 268–285.Google Scholar
ROBIE, David 1989: Blood on their Banner: Nationalist Struggles in the South Pacific. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
ROBSON, Alan 1995: “Review of Blood on their Banner”, Pacific Journalism Review 2(1) http://acij.uts.edu.au/PJR/issues/back95/95blood.html.Google Scholar
ROLFE, Jim 2004: Oceania and Terrorism: Some Linkages with the Wider Region and the Necessary Responses. Wellington: Centre for Strategic Studies, Working Paper #19/04.Google Scholar
ROTBERG, Robert (ed.) 2004 When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALTFORD, John 2002: The United Nations and the Indonesian Takeover of West Papua, 1962-1969: The Anatomy of Betrayal. Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
TILLY, Charles 1985 “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime”, in Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.), Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TILLY, Charles 1975 The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
UNDERWOOD, Robert 2004 “A Return to Confidence: Recolonization is not the Answer”, Pacific Magazine 29(6), June, 5.Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS 1960: Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV), 947th Plenary Meeting, 14 December.Google Scholar
VAN DER VEUR, Paul 1966: Search for New Guinea's Boundaries, From Torres Straits to the Pacific. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
WAINWRIGHT, Elsina 2003: “Responding to State Failure—The Case of Australia and the Solomon Islands”, Australian Journal of International Affairs 57(3): 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WELLER, Marc 2005: “The Self-Determination Trap”, Ethnopolitics 4(1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WINDYBANK, Susan 2003: “Will Papua New Guinea Become a ‘Failed State‘?”, International Herald Tribune, 8 April.Google Scholar
WINDYBANK, Susan and MANNING, Mike 2003: Papua New Guinea on the Brink. Sydney: The Centre for Independent Studies, Issue Analysis #30.Google Scholar