Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T12:57:09.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Disinformation and Human Rights Violations at the Heart of Fukushima and the Olympic Games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Shaun Burnie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the run up to the 2020 summer Olympics / Paralympics, multiple violations of the human rights of citizens and workers impacted by the Fukushima nuclear disaster persist. UN human rights experts have continued to challenge the Abe government over its record. Ignoring basic scientific principles of radiation protection, the government is deliberately distorting reality on actual contamination, the limited effectiveness and scope of decontamination and risks in Fukushima prefecture. Abe's disinformation narrative on Fukushima is aimed at erasing the image of Fukushima as the location of one of the world's nuclear disasters, and, by so doing, reviving the prospects for the nation's nuclear industry. There remains a window in the coming months for a wider understanding of the complex reality in Fukushima, the ongoing radiological conditions and impacts, and the struggle of tens of thousands of evacuees and workers to secure their legal rights.

Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , March 2020 , e14
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2020

References

Burnie, Shaun, 2016. “TEPCO Prosecution: A Sign That Japan's Nuclear Industry Is in Free Fall”, The Diplomat, 4 March 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace, , 2017. “Nuclear Waste Crisis In Fukushima Decontamination Program”, December 2017.Google Scholar
Greenpeace, , 2019a. “High levels of radiation observed at J-Village in Fukushima Prefecture”, Letter to Mr. Shinjiro Koizumi Minister Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan, 18 November.Google Scholar
Greenpeace, , 2019b. “J-Village still contaminated – major uncertainties over decontamination and Olympic torch route”, 17 December.Google Scholar
HBO, “Fukushima” Real Sports 274, January 2020.Google Scholar
The Lancet, 2015. “Ionizing radiation and risk of death from leukemia and lymphoma in radiation- monitored workers (INWORKS): an international cohort study”, Klervi Leuraud, David B Richardson, Elisabeth Cardis, Robert D Daniels, Michael Gillies, Jacqueline A O'Hagan, Ghassan B Hamra, Richard Haylock, Dominique Laurier, Monika Moissonnier, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Ausrele Kesminiene, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Public Health England's Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE-CRCE), University of North Carolina (UNC), Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Drexel University -School of Public Health, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), CIBER- BBN, IRSN laboratory Ionizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory (LEPID), Lancet Haematol, 22 June.Google Scholar
Shimbun, Mainichi, 2020. “Plaintiffs, supporters rejoice over court's decision to suspend Ehime nuclear reactor”, Misa Koyama and Akari Terouchi, Hiroshima Bureau, and Yongho Lee, Fukuyama Bureau, 18 January 2020.Google Scholar
McCurry, Justin, 2017. “Fukushima operator can restart nuclear reactors at world's biggest plant”, The Guardian, 4 October 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2018. “Response from the Government of Japan to the Joint Communication by the United Nations Human Rights Council”, MOFA, 6 November.Google Scholar
Nikkei, , 2020. “TEPCO lending troubles Japanese banks Climate change risks cannot be ignored”, Jun Watanabe, 14 February.Google Scholar
OHCHR, 2013. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health”, Anand Grover Addendum Mission to Japan (15 - 26 November 2012), A/HRC/23/41/Add.3 Distr.: General 2 May 2013.Google Scholar
OHCHR, 2018a, “Japan must halt returns to Fukushima, radiation remains a concern, says UN rights expert”, 25 October.Google Scholar
OHCHR, 2018b, “Human rights and the protection of workers from exposure to toxic substances.”.Google Scholar
Ryall, Julian, 2017.”Japan's TEPCO nuclear plant restarts fear of new Fukushima” Deutche Welle, 5 October.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mycle, ed., 2019. “World Nuclear Status Report 2019”, 27 September.Google Scholar
TEPCO, 2019. “Decontamination work at vicinity of J-Village”, 4 December.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Kendra, 2016. “Radiation Reloaded: Ecological Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident 5 years later”, Greenpeace Japan.Google Scholar