Hostname: page-component-5ffc9858b4-8b2qz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-25T02:36:31.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protesting Policy and Practice in South Korea's Nuclear Energy Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Extract

The Fukushima nuclear disaster of March 2011 has raised serious questions about nuclear power.

In our work since Fukushima, we have tried to answer two questions: What is the current status of nuclear energy in Asia? Does nuclear power have a future in East Asia? By answering those questions, we hope to contribute to the global debate about nuclear energy. To be sure, questions of such magnitude can rarely be answered with a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Decisions on energy are made at the national level, on the basis of both objective factors such as cost-effectiveness and notions of the national interest, and less objective ones, such as influence peddled by power plant operators, corruption, and bureaucratic self-interest. Nevertheless, by closely examining the status and probable future of nuclear power plants in specific countries, the authors of this volume come up with answers, albeit mostly of a negative nature. At the start of 2017, 450 nuclear power reactors were operating in 30 countries, with 60 more under construction in 15 countries. Thirty-four reactors are under construction in Asia, including 21 in China. The “Fukushima effect” has clearly had an impact in Asia, however. In China, no new construction took place between 2011 and 2014, although since then there has been a slow increase of licenses. Nevertheless, the full story of China's embrace of nuclear power, as told in this volume by M. V. Ramana and Amy King, is that the onset of a ‘new normal’ in economic growth objectives and structural changes in the economy have led to a declining demand for electricity and the likelihood of far less interest in nuclear power than had once been predicted. On the other hand, in South Korea, which relies on nuclear power for about 31 per cent of its electricity, Lauren Richardson's chapter which is presented here, shows that the Fukushima disaster and strong civil society opposition have not deflected official support of nuclear power, not only for electricity but also for export.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylon, Caroline, Livingstone, David, and Brunt, Roger, 2015. Cyber security at civil nuclear facilities: Understanding the risks. Chatham House Report. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Cho, Mee-young, 2013. Stung by scandal, South Korea weighs up cost of nuclear energy. Reuters, 28 October.Google Scholar
Choi, Seung-hyeon, 2014. Referendum on Samcheok nuclear power plant ends in overwhelming opposition, a true victory for citizen autonomy: Expected to accelerate anti-nuclear movements in other regions. Kyunghyang Shinmun, 10 October.Google Scholar
Dalton, Toby, and Cha, Minkyeong, 2016. South Korea's nuclear energy future. The Diplomat, 23 February.Google Scholar
East Coast Solidarity for Anti-Nuke Group, 2012. Pamphlet. Seoul.Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter, and Moon, Chung-in, 2011. Park Chung Hee, the CIA, and the bomb. Global Asia 6 (3): 4658.Google Scholar
Hermanns, Heike, 2015. South Korean nuclear energy policies and the public agenda in the 21st century. Asian Politics & Policy 7 (2): 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, G. H., Hernández-Ceballos, M. A., Lozano, R. L., Kim, Y. I., Lee, H. M., Kim, S. H., Yeh, S.-W., Bolivar, J. P., and Baskaran, M., 2012. Radioactive impact in South Korea from the damaged nuclear reactors in Fukushima: Evidence of long and short range transport. Journal of Radiological Protection 32 (4): 397411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, Hae Ryong, and Kim, Shin Whan, 2013. Korean nuclear power technology. In Asia's Energy Trends and Developments, Vol. 2, edited by Hong, Mark and Lugg, Amy, 193-204. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), 2012. IAEA completes expert mission to Kori 1 nuclear power plant in Republic of Korea. Press release, 11 June.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)-NSNI (Division of Nuclear Installation Safety), 2012. Report of the expert mission to review the station blackout event that happened at Kori 1 NPP on 9 February 2012, Republic of Korea. 4-11 June. http://kfem.or.kr/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/1419321177_zkGfGz.pdf (accessed 6 February 2017).Google Scholar
KHNP (Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power), 2012. IAEA completes expert mission to Kori 1 nuclear power plant in Republic of Korea. Press release, 13 June. (accessed 6 February 2017).Google Scholar
Kim, Se-jeong, 2015. Referendum on nuke plant turns invalid. Korea Times, 13 November.Google Scholar
Korean Government, 2011. Policy Issue 0: Report of the Korean government response to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. https://www.oecd-nea.org/nsd/fukushima/documents/Korea_2011_08Policy00GovernmentResponsetoFukushimaAccident.pdf (accessed 25 January 2017).Google Scholar
LaForge, John, 2013–14. Defective reactor parts scandal in South Korea sees 100 indicted. Nukewatch Quarterly Winter:7.Google Scholar
Lee, Myung-bak, 2010. Shifting paradigms: The road to global green growth. Global Asia 4 (4): 812.Google Scholar
Leem, Sung-Jin, 2006. Unchanging vision of nuclear energy: Nuclear power policy of the South Korean government and citizens' challenge. Energy & Environment 17 (3): 439–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurry, Justin, 2014. South Korean nuclear operator hacked amid cyber-attack fears. The Guardian, 23 December.Google Scholar
Ministry of Science and Technology, 2006. Je 3-cha wonjaryeok jinheung jonghap gyehoek [Third comprehensive plan for nuclear energy development]. Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, 2014. Je 2-cha eneoji gibbon gyehoek [The second national energy plan]. Seoul: Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy.Google Scholar
Nagata, Kazuaki, 2012. Fukushima puts East Asia nuclear policies on notice. Japan Times, 1 February.Google Scholar
Norman, Andrew, and Nagtzaam, Gerry, 2016. Decision-Making and Radioactive Waste Disposal. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sayvetz, Leah Grady, 2012. South Koreans stop plan for nuclear waste dump on Gulup Island, 1994-95. Global Nonviolent Action Database. (accessed 25 January 2017).Google Scholar
Von Hippel, David, Yun, Sun-Jin, and Cho, Myung-Rae, 2011. The current status of green growth in Korea: Energy and urban security. Asia-Pacific Journal 9 (44)4: 115.Google Scholar
Yi, Whan-woo, 2012. Potential nuclear risk. Korea Times, 21 May.Google Scholar