No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2025
Out in the academic cemetery to which avatars of market fundamentalism thought they had consigned their intellectual and political opponents, one can hear today the unmistakable scrape of coffin lids opening. And climbing out of their graves are the bodies of those who contend that the reductionist assumptions of neo-classical/rational choice orthodoxy are not simply inadequate but flawed in the most fundamental sense.
[1] See for example two best-sellers: Justin Fox, The Myth of the Rational Market (Harper Collins, 2009) and Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Random House, 2007).
[2] Perry Anderson, /Spectrum: from right to left in the world of ideas /(London:Verso, 2005) p. 258.
[3] An exception is Leo Panitch, Martijn Konings, Sam Gindin, and Scott Aquanno, “The Political Economy of the Subprime Crisis” in Leo Panitch and Martijn Konings (eds.), American Empire and the Political Economy of Global Finance, 2nd ed., New York: Palgrave, 2009, pp. 253-292. This piece does indeed rival the depth of Brenner's analysis, albeit without the focus on Asia, and underscores the wider point that Marxian scholarship may ultimately have both a more penetrating and a more comprehensive take on the current crisis than mainstream neo-classical and neo-Keynesian writing.