Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-2wr7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-01T06:57:40.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Hermeneutics of Radiation and the Three Tsunamis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Abstract

The first tsunami that hit northern Japan in March 2011 was a big wave of salt water. The second tsunami was comprised of cement dikes designed to protect against a tsunami. The third tsunami is a socio-political process that erases memory of the disaster. The nuclear disaster that followed the first tsunami has reactivated the dispute over the effects of low-dose radiation. This controversy, which dates back to the experience of the hibakusha in 1945, includes a problem of hermeneutics—a conflict of interpretation—over what is being counted as “data”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asanuma-Brice, C. (2021) Fukushima, dix ans après: sociologie d'un désastre. Paris: MSH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.C. (2014) ‘Call it A ‘Wash’? Historical Perspectives on Conundrums of Technological Modernization, Flood Amelioration and Disasters in Modern Japan’, The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 12 (7) [Online].Google Scholar
Cleveland, K., Knowles, S.G. and Shineha, R. (2021). ‘Introduction’ in Cleveland, K., Knowles, S.G., and Shineha, R. (ed.) Legacies of Fukushima:3.11 in Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobin, P. (2017) ‘Nuclear Gypsies in Fukushima Before and After 3.11’, in MacDowell, L. (ed.) Nuclear Portraits: People, Communities and the Environment. Academia [Online].Google Scholar
Jobin, P. (2020) ‘The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and Civil Actions as a Social Movement’, The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 18 (9) [Online].Google Scholar
Jobin, P. (2021) ‘Nuclear Labor, Its Invisibility, and the Dispute over Low-Dose Radiation’, in Cleveland, K., Knowles, S.G. and Shineha, R. (ed.) Legacies of Fukushima:3.11 in Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.T., Fukurai, H. and Hirayama, M. (2020) ‘Reflections on the TEPCO Trial: Prosecution and Acquittal after Japan's Nuclear Meltdown’, The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 18 (2) [Online].Google Scholar
Leuraud, K., Richardson, D., Cardis, Elisabeth, et al. (2015) ‘Ionising Radiation and Risk of Death from Leukemia and Lymphoma in Radiation-Monitored Workers (INWORKS): An International Cohort Study’, Lancet Haematology, 2 (7) [Online].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, R.J. (2021) ‘Foreword’ in Cleveland, K., Knowles, S.G., and Shineha, R. (ed.) Legacies of Fukushima:3.11 in Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. xi-xiii.Google Scholar
Nagataki, S., and Kasagi, F. (2015) ‘INWORKS Study: Risk of Leukemia from Protracted Radiation Exposure’, The Lancet Haematology, 2 (10) [Online].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pons, P. (2021) ‘Au Japon, dix ans après le tsunami, la déferlante de béton’, Le Monde, 30 March [Online].Google Scholar
Scoccimarro, R. (2020) ‘Tsunami de béton: de l'empreinte à l'emprise sur les paysages littoraux après les catastrophes du 11 mars 2011‘, Projets de paysage, 23 [Online].CrossRefGoogle Scholar