Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-r2nwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T21:51:28.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geopolynomics and Japan: Asia-Pacific Policy Prescriptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Brendan M. Howe
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Characterized as everything from a great power to a reactive state, Japan faces many diplomatic challenges. Nevertheless, Japan has become increasingly active on the international stage, reflecting a subtle shift from “exclusive bilateralism to modest multilateralism” (Mulgan 2008). Yet, especially in the Asia-Pacific, contemporary multilateralism is itself challenged geopolitically, geoeconomically, and geoculturally. In this strategic context, and particularly in response to great power contestation, “minilaterals” have proliferated, with Japan keen to join. Although current regional minilaterals are critiqued as creating as many problems as they resolve, restricting the agenda-setting of second-tier powers like Japan, a geopolynomic perspective illustrates how alternative policy prescriptions for leadership include non-traditional security minilaterals and regional international commissions.

Keywords

JapanMultilateralismMinilateralsGeopolynomicsSecond-Tier Powers
Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , e5
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2024

References

Acharya, A. 2003. “Guns and Butter: Why do Human Security and Traditional Security Coexist in Asia?” Global Economic Review 32 (3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, T. 1993. “From Sword to Chrysanthemum: Japan's Culture of Antimilitarism” International Security 17 (4): 119–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, R. 1995. “Wealth, Power, and Conflict: East Asia After the Cold War.” In East Asia in Transition, edited by Ross, R. S., 21–58. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Buzan, B., and Segal, G. 1994. “Rethinking East Asian Security” Survival 36 (2): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, K. 1988. “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State”, World Politics 40 (4): 517–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, K. 2006. “Halfway to hegemony: Japan's tortured trajectory” Harvard International Review 27 (3): 46–49.Google Scholar
Calder, K., and Ye, M. 2010. The Making of Northeast Asia (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Cha, V. 2012. “Ripe for Rivalry: Has Asia's moment of reckoning finally arrived?” Foreign Policy December 13. https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/12/13/ripe-for-rivalry/.Google Scholar
Chhangani, A., Tey, A., & Noor, E. 2022. “Is Minilateralism the Future of the Indo-Pacific.” Asia Society Summary Report. March 29. https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/ASPI_IndoPacific_SummReport_finalize.pdfGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
Friedberg, A. 1993-94. “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia.” International Security 18 (3): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, E. 2022. “World's biggest military: Top 10 list by budget, active and reserve members” USA Today August 27. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2022/08/27/who-has-biggest-military-world-most-powerful/7888866001/Google Scholar
Howe, Brendan. 2005. “Three futures: geopolynomic transition and the implications for regional security in Northeast Asia” Modern Asian Studies 39 (4): 761–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Brendan. 2010. “Between Normality & Uniqueness: Unwrapping the Enigma of Japanese Security Policy Decision-Making” Modern Asian Studies 44 (6): 1313–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Brendan. 2021. “Challenges to and Opportunities for International Organization in East Asia” Global Society 35 (4): 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, M., and Takagi, S.. 2009. “Why was Japan Hit So Hard by the Global Financial Crisis?” ADBI Working Paper 153. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. http://www.adbi.org/working-paper/2009/10/05/3343.japan.gfc/Google Scholar
Mahhubani, K. 1995. “The Pacific Way.” Foreign Affairs 74 (1): 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, A. 2008. “Breaking the Mould: Japan's Subtle Shift from Exclusive Bilateralism to Modest Minilateralism” Contemporary Southeast Asia 30 (1): 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naím, M. 2009. “Minilateralism” Foreign Policy, 173. https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/06/21/minilateralism/Google Scholar
Nilsson-Wright, J. 2017. “Creative Minilateralism in a Changing Asia: Opportunities for Security Convergence and Cooperation Between Australia, India and Japan” Chatham House Asia Programme Research Paper, July. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/images/2017-07-28-Minilateralism.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa, Y. 2009. “Human security in Southeast Asia: Viable solution or empty slogan?” Security Dialogue 40 (2):217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obuchi, K. 1998. “Toward the Creation of a Bright Future for Asia,” policy speech at the Lecture Program hosted by the Institute for International Relations Lecture Program (Hanoi, Vietnam). http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/asean/pmv9812/policyspeech.htmlGoogle Scholar
Patrick, S. 2015. “The New ‘New Multilateralism’: Minilateral Cooperation, but at What Cost?” Global Summitry 1 (2): 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/global/guv008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richey, M., and Reiterer, M. 2022. “Japan's Indo-Pacific Leadership Aspirations” East Asia Forum August 4. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2022/08/02/answering-the-bell-japans-indo-pacific-leadership-aspirations/#more-1078115Google Scholar
Robertson, J. 2020. “In Search of a Middle-power Rethink on North Korea Policy.” The Interpreter, November 25. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/searchmiddle-power-rethink-north-korea-policy?fbclid=IwAR1Uz2RfQNO4rNqrsFetFnuJ6mlwMJ8XqY_KfbbCXMcX01AjQ1HIWMo4RXEGoogle Scholar
Rudderham, M.A. 2008. “Middle Power Pull: Can Middle Powers use Public Diplomacy to Ameliorate the Image of the West?” York Centre for International Security Studies Working Paper, 46. http://yciss.info.yorku.ca/files/2012/06/WP46-Rudderham.pdfGoogle Scholar
Soeya, Y. 2013. “Prospects for Japan as a Middle Power” East Asia Forum, July 29. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/07/29/prospects-for-japan-as-a-middle-power/Google Scholar
Suzuki, K. 2024. “Japanese Economic Security as ”Derisking“ Korea Policy 1 (3): 38–51.Google Scholar
Tellis, A., Bially, J., Layne, C., & McPherson, M. 2000. Measuring Power in the Postindustrial Age. (Santa Monica: RAND).Google Scholar
Vom Hau, M., Scott, J., & Hulme, D. 2012. “Beyond the BRICs: Alternative Strategies of Influence in the Global Politics of Development” European Journal of Development Research 24 (2): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L., Wang, D., & Evans, J. 2019. “Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology” Nature 566: 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed