Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T23:36:24.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commemoration and Meaning: The Case of Fukushima

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Robert Jay Lifton  and
Scott Gabriel Knowles
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Disaster commemoration serves as a moment to remember victims and honor survivors. In the case of 3.11, commemoration works differently. As a slow disaster, with radiation exposure and evacuation at the center of the story, 3.11 is not yet over. This places special importance on commemoration as a moment for memory, but also for ongoing commitments to research, justice, and health interventions for survivors.

Keywords

Fukushimadisasternuclear energycommemorationsurvivorsvictims
Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 19 , Issue 17 , September 2021 , e3
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

References

COVIDCalls. (2021) Fukushima and the Pandemic: A 3.11 Memorial Episode with Sulfikar Amir, Kohta Juraku, Kyoko Sato, and Ryuma Shineha [Online video]. March 8. Accessed: July 18, 2021).Google Scholar
Cleveland, K, Knowles, S., and Shineha, R. (Eds.) (2021) Legacies of Fukushima:3.11 in Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honda, N., Kelman, I., Kikuchi, S., Kim, Y., Kobayashi, N., Nemoto, H., Seto, M., and Tomita, H. (2019) ‘Post-Disaster Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in the Areas Affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake: A Qualitative Study’, BMC Psychiatry, 19 (261).Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. (2021) Ten-year Anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Decade of Improving Nuclear Safety [Online] Accessed: June 15, 2021.Google Scholar
Lifton, R. (1968) Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima. 2nd edn. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lifton, R. (1986) ‘Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Hiroshima’, New York Times, May 18 [Online]. Accessed: July 18, 2021).Google Scholar
Loh, S.L. and Amir, S. (2019) ‘Healing Fukushima: Radiation Hazards and Disaster Medicine in Post-3.11 Japan’, Social Studies of Science, 49 (3), pp. 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maly, L. and Yamazaki, M. (2021) ‘Disaster Museums in Japan: Telling the Stories of Disasters Before and After 3.11’, Journal of Disaster Research, 16 (2), pp. 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normile, D. (2021a) ‘This Physician Has Studied the Fukushima Disaster for a Decade—and Found a Surprising Health Threat’, Science, March 4 [Online]. Accessed: July 18, 2021.Google Scholar
Normile, D. (2021b) ‘Japan Plans to Release Fukushima's Wastewater into the Ocean’, Science, April 13 [Online]. Accessed: July 18, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, M. and Inoue, M. (2021) ‘Ten Years After Fukushima Disaster, This Nurse May Be the Region's Best Hope’, New York Times, March 9 [Online]. Accessed: July 18, 2021.Google Scholar