Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-pw477 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-01T20:54:01.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“The Backside of Japan,” Development, and Imperialism in Northeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Abstract

Today, it is customary to describe the Japanese archipelago in terms of the neutral distinction between the Sea of Japan side (Nihonkai-gawa) and the Pacific Ocean side (Taiheiyō-gawa). For much of the 20th century, however, these regions were called respectively ura Nihon and omote Nihon, or roughly “the Backside of Japan” and “the Frontside of Japan.” This continued until the 1960s when the terms were criticized as discriminatory and their usage terminated. How, then, did the Sea of Japan coastal region come to be known by the discriminatory term “the Backside”? Intrigued by this question, this paper retraces the little-studied history of the place name ura Nihon. As I will show, behind the place name ura Nihon are forgotten histories not just of uneven domestic economic development but also colonial expansion and empire building in Northeast Asia. That is, ura Nihon is both a history of the Japanese nation and of the empire. By retelling this history, the paper seeks to contribute to understanding the ways in which empire building in Northeast Asia was connected to the domestic history of the Japanese nation-state in the 20th century.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, Tsunehisa. Ura Nihon ha ikani tsukuraretaka. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha, 1997.Google Scholar
Friedman, Edward and Mark Selden, eds. America's Asia: Dissenting essays on Asian-American relations. New York: Pantheon Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Fukuzawa, Yukichi. kuni-zukushi. Tokyo: Keio Gijuku Zōhan, 1869.Google Scholar
Furumaya, Tadao. Ura Nihon: kindai Nihon wo toinaosu. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1998.Google Scholar
Harada, Toyokichi. “Nihon chishitsu kōzō ron,” Chishitsu yōhō no. 2 (1888), 309355.Google Scholar
Inoue, Yuichi. Testudō geeji ga kaeta gendaishi. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 1990.Google Scholar
Niichirō, Matsunami. “Nihonkai ni taisuru hōjin no katsudō,” Tōhoku hyōron no. 8 (March 15, 1906), 1215.Google Scholar
Matsuo, Kosaburō. Nihonkai chūshin ron: kotōteki jikaku. Tokyo: Kaikoku Kōronsha, 1922.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, Yoshihisa. The Making of Japanese Manchuria, 1904-1932. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001.Google Scholar
Morris-Suzuki, Tessa. Exodus to North Korea: Shadows from Japan's Cold War. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007.Google Scholar
Oikawa, Yoshinobu. Nihon tetsudō shi: batsumatsu Meiji hen. Tokyo: Chūō Kōron Shinsha, 2014.Google Scholar
Pumpelly, Raphael. Geological researches in China, Mongolia and Japan during the years 1862 to 1865. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 1866.Google Scholar
Saaler, Sven. “Nihon no tairiku shinshutsu to Shiberia shuppei: teikoku shugi kakucho no ‘kanestsu shihai soko’ wo megutte,” Kanazawa Daigaku Keizai gakubu ronshū 19, no. 1 (Dec. 1998), 259285.Google Scholar
Tsukakoshi, Yoshitarō. Chiri to jinji. Tokyo: Minyūsha, 1901.Google Scholar
Yoshii, Kenichi. Kan Nihonkai chiiki shakai no henyō - “Manmō Kantō” to Ura Nihon -. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 2000.Google Scholar