Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2mk96 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T16:45:30.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

After 3.11: Imposing Nuclear Energy on a Skeptical Japanese Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Jeff Kingston
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In April 2014 Prime Minister Abe unveiled Japan's new national energy strategy, reinstating nuclear energy as a key source of energy even as the shambolic cleanup and decommissioning at the Fukushima Daiichi lurches from one blunder to the next malfunction, and radiation contaminated groundwater flows into the ocean. This is a major milestone in the comeback of nuclear energy despite a seemingly endless cascade of damning revelations about lax safety practices and perfunctory oversight since the three reactor meltdowns in March 2011. As a result, 2014 may be Japan's last nuclear free summer for the next few decades as pressure is mounting to restart some of Japan's 48 idled reactors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 11 , Issue 23 , June 2013 , e7
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

References

Aldrich, Daniel. 2008. Site Fights: Divisive Facilities and Civil Society in Japan and the West, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cabinet. 2012. Investigation Committee on the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, Final Report, (July 23). The official website is no longer available. A brief summary with links to numerous articles about the findings is available here, (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Jeff Kingston is the Director of Asian Studies, Temple University Japan. He is the editor of Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan's 3/11, Routledge 2012 and the author of Contemporary Japan. (2nd edition), London: Wiley 2013. The author is grateful for the input and suggestions by Andrew DeWit and Mark Selden.Google Scholar
DeWit, Andrew (2014) “Japan's Energy Policy Impasse,” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 12, Issue 14, No. 1, (7 April) .Google Scholar
Diet. 2012. National Diet of Japan, The Official Report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, Executive Summary (July). (85 pages). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Economist. 2012. “The Dream that Failed, Special Report: Nuclear Energy” (8 March). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. 2011. “Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation” International Security, Vol. 36, No. 2:154–189 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPFM. 2013. Masafumi Takubo and Frank von Hippel, “Ending reprocessing in Japan: An alternative approach to managing Japan's spent nuclear fuel and separated plutonium,” (November). Last accessed May 1, 2014.Google Scholar
Hatano, Akira. 2014a “Work on frozen soil walls at Fukushima plant hits glitch”, Asahi (17 May). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Hatano, Akira. 2014b. “Glitch-prone ALPS water treatment equipment shut down at Fukushima plant” Asahi (21 May). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Japan Times. 2014. “Japan to return weapons- grade plutonium to U.S.”, Japan Times (24 March). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Japan Times 2012. (Editorial) “Detecting Active Faults Near Reactors”, Japan Times (14 December) (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Japan Times. 2013. “Editorial: The MOX Fuel Conundrum” (26 July) (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Johnston, Eric. 2014. “Oi Ruling may fuel antinuclear push”, Japan Times, 5/22/2014. (Last accessed 6/1/2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, Yuri. 2012. “Japan's pro-bomb voices rise as nuke power debated” Associated Press, (31 July).Google Scholar
Kimura, Hideaki. 2014a. “90% of TEPCO workers defied orders, fled Fukushima plant in 2011” Asahi, (20 May). (Last accessed 25 May 2014).Google Scholar
Kimura, Hideaki. 2014b. “Hopelessness reigned after TEPCO said Fukushima crisi was ‘out of control’” Asahi. 2 June. (Last accessed 7 June 2014).Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2012a . “The Politics of Disaster, Nuclear Crisis and Recovery,” in Kingston, Jeff (ed.), Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan's 3/11. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 188–206.Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2012b. “Mismanaging Risk and the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis”, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 10:12, 4 (19 March).Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2012c. “Japan's Nuclear Village”, The Asia-Pacific Journal 10:37 1 (10 September).Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2012d. ‘Power Politics: Japan's Resilient Nuclear Village,’ The Asia-Pacific Journal, 10:43, 1, (29 October).Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2013a. “Japan's Nuclear Village: Power and Resilience” in Jeff Kingston, ed., Critical Issues in Contemporary Japan. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 107–119.Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2013b. “Abe's Nuclear Energy Policy and Japan's Future,” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 11, Issue 34, No. 1, August 19.Google Scholar
Kyodo. 2014. “Only 20% of municipalities will OK reactor restarts: poll” Japan Times. (2 March). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Lochbaum, David, Lyman, Edwin and Stranahan, Susan. 2014. Fukushima: The Story of a Nuclear Disaster. New York: The Press Press.Google Scholar
Nikkei. 2014. “Tepco pressed on radioactive water cleanup at Fukushima”, Nikkei Asian Review, (12 April) (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Nikkei 2014. “Japanese companies seeking nuclear business abroad”. Nikkei Asian Review. (19 April) (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Okuyama, Toshihiro. 2014. “U.S. alarmed about plutonium stockpile growing from Rokkasho plant.” Asahi (13 April).Google Scholar
Onitsuka, Hiroshi. 2012. ‘Hooked on Nuclear Power: Japanese State-Local Relations and the Vicious Cycle of Nuclear Dependence,’ The Asia-Pacific Journal 10:3, 1 (16 January).Google Scholar
Oshika, Yasuaki. 2013. “INSIGHT: ‘Troika of irresponsibility’ behind Fukushima water crisis” Asahi (25 November) (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. 2011. “Fukushima and the Inevitability of Accidents.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (6) 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 2012. “Why Power Companies Build Nuclear Reactors on Fault Lines: The Case of Japan.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 13 (2):457–485 (Jan.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RJIF. 2014. Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Investigating the Myth and Reality. (Expanded and updated English edition of the Report by The Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation originally published in Japanese on 1 March 2012) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saito, Mari, Sheldrick, Aaron and Hamada, Kentaro. 2014. “Only a third of nuclear reactors may be restarted” Reuters, (2 April). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard. 2013. 3.11: Disaster and Change in Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sekine, Shinichi. 2014a. “Doubts raised over ‘world's strictest’ claim for new nuclear safety standards”, Asahi (26 April). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Sekine, Shinichi. 2014b. “Nuclear safety inspectors first to flee stricken Fukushima plant”, Asahi. 3 June. (Last accessed 7 June 2014).Google Scholar
Sentaku. 2013. “Municipal nuclear addiction” Sentaku Magazine. November. (As translated in the Japan Times, 26 November) (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Soble, Jonathan. 2012. “Doubts cast over Japan nuclear phase-out”, Financial Times. (23 October). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Solomon, Jay and Inada, Miho. 2013. “Japan's Nuclear Plan Unsettles U.S.” Wall Street Journal (1 May). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Tabuchi, Hiroko. 2012a. “Japan sets policy to phase out nuclear power plants by 2040.” New York Times. 14 September. (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Tabuchi, Hiroko. 2012b. “Japan, under pressure, backs off goal to phase out nuclear power by 2040.” New York Times, 19 September. (Accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Tabuchi, Hiroko. 2013. “Japanese Reactor Is Said to Stand on a Fault Line”, NY Times. (15 May). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Tabuchi, Hiroko. 2014. “Japan Pushes Plan to Stockpile Plutonium, Despite Proliferation Risks”, NY Times (9 April). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Taki, Junichi. 2014. “Japan's nuclear problems hide behind ‘bureaucratese’” Nikkei Asian Review, (1 May). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Takubo, Masa. 2011. “Nuclear or Not? The Complex and Uncertain Politics of Japan's Post- Fukushima Energy Policy”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67 (5) 2011, 19–26.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Miya. 2014. “Critics Hit Nuke Power Justification” Japan Times (16 April). (Last accessed 24 May 2014).Google Scholar
Toki, Masako and Pomper, Miles. 2014. “Japan Holds to Dangerous Plutonium Separation Plan”, Asia Times, (7 February).Google Scholar