Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-zrtmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-01T10:08:57.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tying Knots of En: An Ethnography among Uncertain Walls in Fukushima's Gray Zone in 2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Abstract

Twelve years after the TEPCO nuclear accident in coastal Fukushima, the newly revised compensation policy and the discharge of water at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Station are threatening to produce social and political divisions among the residents in coastal Fukushima between scientific experts and lay public, and between countries. In a time of heightened societal divisions, what is the role of scholars? By sharing ethnographic stories in Fukushima's gray zone in 2023, the essay explores how scholars can learn from people on the ground to challenge narratives and systems that divide people from the environment and the land from the ecosystem to explore stories, voices, and perspectives that provide connections. (This article is based on Nuclear Ghost: Atomic Livelihoods in Fukushima's Gray Zone, recently published by the University of California Press).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Das, Veena. 2000. “Suffering, Legitimacy, and Healing: The Bhopal Case.” In Illness and the Environment: A Reader in Contested Medicine, edited by Kroll-Smith, J. Stephen, Brown, Phil, and Gunter, V. J., 270-87. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hecht, Gabrielle. 2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2023. “IAEA Comprehensive Report on the Safety Review of the ALPS-Treated Water at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.” https://web.archive.org/web/20230707043946/https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Japan Rail West. 2018. “The Number of Passengers at Each Station in 2018.” [各駅の乗 車人数 2018 年], https://web.archive.org/web/20230221155110/https:/www.jreast.co.jp/passenger/201807.html.Google Scholar
Japan Times. 2023. Man Arrested over Robbery Released Without Indictment in Fukushima. April, 4. https://web.archive.org/web/20230411083425/https://japantoday.com/category/crime/man-arrested-over-robbery-released-without-indictment-in-fukushima-prefecture.Google Scholar
Kimura, Aya. 2016. Radiation Brain Moms and Citizen Scientists. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Riken. 2021. Shin fukkō ron zouho ban. Tokyo: GenronGoogle Scholar
Kumaki, Hiroko. 2022. “Suspending Nuclearity: Ecologies of Planting Seeds after the Nuclear Fallout in Fukushima, Japan.” Cultural Anthropology 37, No. 4: 707737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurokawa, Kishō. 1977. The Culture of Gary [グ レーの文化]: Nihonteki kūkan toshiteno “en.” Tokyo: Souseiki.Google Scholar
Minamisōma City. 2022. The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Archive: The Records to Be Delivered 100 Years Later. Haramachi: Minamisōma City.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Ryo. 2023. Nuclear Ghost: Atomic Livelihoods in Fukushima's Gray Zone. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Ryo. 2021. Commentary: Ethnographic Lettering: “Pursed Lips: A Call to Suspend Damage in the Age of Decommissioning. Critical Asian Studies, March 22, https://doi.org/10/52698/ASPR7364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haruki, Murakami. 2011. 1Q84. Translated by Rubin, Jay and Gabriel, Phillip. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Publisher.Google Scholar
Nomura, Toyohiro, Masato, Dogauchi, Shinsuke, Toyonaga. 2022. Atomic Energy Damage Compensation Law: Commentary [原子 力損害賠償法:コメンタール]. Tokyo: Dai-Ichi Hoki.Google Scholar
Nuclear Damage Compensation Dispute Review Board. 2022. “Fifth Supplement to the Interim Guidelines on Determining the Scope of Nuclear Damage Caused by the Fukushima Daiichi and Daini Nuclear Power Plants.” [東京 電力株式会社福島第1、第二原子力発電所事故に よる県視力損害の範囲の判定等に関する中間指 針第五次補足]. https://web.archive.org/web/20221220120009/https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20221220-mxt_san-gen01-000026516_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Oguma, Eiji. 2013. “Nobody Dies in a Ghost Town: Path Dependence in Japan's 3.11 Disaster and Reconstruction.” Translated by Shin-Lin Loh. Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 11 (44), No. 1. https://apjjf.org/2013/11/44/Oguma-Eiji/4024/article.html.Google Scholar
Silko, Leslie Marmon. 1977. Ceremony. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sternsdorff-Cisterna, Nicolas. 2020. Food Safety after Fukushima: Scientific Citizenship andthe Politics of Risk. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Satsuki. 2023. Fukushima Futures: Survival Stories om a Repeatedly Ruined Seascape. Seattle: University of Washington Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, Kyle. 2021. “Against Crisis Epistemology.” In Handbook of Critical Indigenous Studies, edited by Moreton-Robinson, A., Tuhiwai-Smith, L., Andersen, C., and Larkin, S., 5264. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar