Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:50:43.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reclassification at Chelsea College of Art & Design Library

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Elizabeth Lawes  and
Tania Olsson
Elizabeth Lawes*
Affiliation:
UCL Library Services, Room 105, Main Library, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Tania Olsson*
Affiliation:
Camberwell Chelsea Wimbledon, Chelsea College of Art & Design Library, 16 John Islip Street, London SW1P 4JU, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article examines some of the problems associated with the initial classification and subsequent reclassification of a specialist Fine Art library. The Library at the then Chelsea School of Art was established in the early 1960s. It was unusual, ‘being predominantly a fine art (painting and sculpture) institution, with lesser responsibilities in design.’ Most ‘off the peg’ classification schemes do not incorporate enough flexibility for the detail required by such a specific collection, but do include large sections devoted to design subjects which were unnecessary at the time. It was decided, therefore, to create a bespoke scheme for the Chelsea collection, and this was adapted several times over the years to fit in with the changing landscape of art history and art education. In January 2005, Chelsea College of Art & Design relocated to a new unified site on Millbank, merging the three very specialised libraries: Manresa Road (Fine Art), Hugon Road (Interior and Spatial Design, Graphics and Illustration) and Lime Grove (Textiles and Public Art). One of the major challenges of this relocation was to bring all the collections together under one classification scheme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , 2011 , pp. 34 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Doran, Stephen and Phillpot, Clive, ‘Classification in art libraries,’ ARLIS newsletter no.5 (September 1970): 2.Google Scholar
2. Ibid., 5.Google Scholar
3. Ibid., 2.Google Scholar
4. Ibid., 5.Google Scholar
5. Ibid., 3.Google Scholar
6. Phillpot, Clive, ‘Chelsea School of Art Library classification scheme, nth edition,’ Art libraries journal 3, no.2 (Summer 1978): 15.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., 16.Google Scholar
8. Ibid., 17.Google Scholar
9. Ibid., 16.Google Scholar
10. Bury, Stephen, Chelsea School of Art library classification scheme, 3rd ed. (London: Chelsea School of Art Library, 1983), i.Google Scholar
11. Ward, Liz, e-mail message to Tania Olsson, 18 April 2010.Google Scholar
12. Bury, Stephen, e-mail message to Tania Olsson, 18 March 2010.Google Scholar
13. Doran, Stephen and Phillpot, Clive, ‘Classification in art libraries,’ ARLIS newsletter no.5 (September 1970): 4.Google Scholar
14. Doran, and Phillpot, , ‘Classification in art libraries,’ 4.Google Scholar