Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:00:20.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ephemera in the art library

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Elizabeth Lawes*
Affiliation:
Chelsea School of Art & Design, Manresa Road, London SW3 6LS, UK
Vicky Webb*
Affiliation:
Chelsea School of Art & Design, Manresa Road, London SW3 6LS, UK
Get access

Abstract

Art libraries acquire a large amount of ephemeral material which creates a unique resource on the history of contemporary art. Librarians have to decide what should be retained, how it should be stored, and how the material can best be accessed. Increasingly there is pressure to digitise in order to promote collections, but how effective this process is in terms of ephemeral material remains a real question. A survey of prominent collections in London and New York has helped to inform future plans for the ephemera held by the library at Chelsea College of Art & Design.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1. Moeglin-Delcroix, Anne. ‘Art for the occasion’ in Extra art, 2001, p.6. Santa Monica: Smart Art Press, 2001. ISBN 1889195480.Google Scholar
3. The Inventory archive, Chelsea College of Art & Design Libraries Special Collections http://www.linst.ac.uk/library/libinf/special/che_ia.htm.Google Scholar
4. Arshile Gorky and the Whitney Museum of American Art http://www.whitney.org/research/gorky.shtml.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Books and catalogues

Extra art: a survey of artists’ ephemera, 1960-1999. Santa Monica: Smart Art Press, 2001. ISBN 1889195480.Google Scholar
Potential: ongoing archive. Southampton: John Hansard Gallery, 2002. ISBN 9075380488.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Paul, ed. Private views. London: London Print Gallery/Kent Institute of Art & Design, 2002. ISBN 1898607028.Google Scholar
Art libraries journal vol. 27 no. 2 2002 – issue on ephemera.Google Scholar
Ashe, Mary. ‘Preservation of the avant-garde: contemporary archives’. Art documentation vol. 10 no. 2 1999, p.8687.Google Scholar
Frank, Peter. ‘Giving it away’. Art on paper vol. 6 no. 2 November/December 2001, p.2526.Google Scholar
Keats, Jonathon. ‘“Extra art” at CCAC’s Logan Galleries’. Artweek vol. 33 no. 1 February 2002, p. 1920.Google Scholar
Lemke, Antje B.Art archives: a common concern of archivists, librarians, and museum professionals’. Art libraries journal vol. 14 no. 2 1989, p.511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love-Rogers, Christine. ‘New initiatives to solve old problems: collecting exhibition catalogues at the National Art Library’. Art libraries journal vol. 24 no. 2 1999, p.811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillpot, Clive. ‘Flies in the files: ephemera in the art library’. Art documentation Spring 1995, p. 1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Jack. ‘The exhibition catalog as source of artists’ primary documents’. Art libraries journal vol. 14 no. 2 1989, p.3236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Anat. ‘Winning ephemera: a top-ten list’. Art on paper vol. 5 no. 6 July/August 2001, p. 1819.Google Scholar
Inventory archive, Chelsea College of Art & Design Libraries Special Collections http://www.linst.ac.uk/library/libinf/special/che_ia.htm Google Scholar
Arshile Gorky and the Whitney Museum of American Art http://www.whitney.org/research/gorky.shtml.Google Scholar