Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:37:40.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digitizing artist periodicals: new methodologies from the Digital Humanities for Analysing Artist Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Thomas Crombez
Thomas Crombez*
Affiliation:
Koninklijke Academie voor Schone Kunsten, Mutsaardstraat 31, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The research project Digital Archive of Belgian Neo-Avant-garde Periodicals (DABNAP) aims to digitize and analyse a large number of artists’ periodicals from the period 1950–1990. The artistic renewal in Belgium since the 1950s, sustained by small groups of artists (such as G58 or De Nevelvlek), led to a first generation of post-war artist periodicals. Such titles proved decisive for the formation of the Belgian neo-avant-garde in literature and the visual arts. During the sixties and the seventies, happening and socially-engaged art took over and gave a new orientation to artist periodicals. In this article, I wish to highlight the challenges and difficulties of this project, for example, in dealing with non-standard formats, types of paper, typography, and non-paper inserts. A fully searchable archive of neo-avant-garde periodicals allows researchers to analyse in much more detail than before how influences from foreign literature and arts took root in the Belgian context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , 2014 , pp. 6 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Search query executed on kranten.kb.nl/using Advanced Search (period: 1919 to 1939, search terms: ‘Amsterdam Stadsschouwburg’). Accessed 16June 2013.Google Scholar
2. Singhal, Amit. “Introducing the Knowledge Graph: things, not strings” Online: Official Google Blog, 12 May 2012. Accessed 27 June 2013, http://googleblog.blogspot.be/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html.Google Scholar
3. See www.dbnl.org.Google Scholar
4. Hobbs, Jerry R. and Rilott, Ellen. “Information Extraction” in Indurkhya, Nitin and Damerau, Fred J. (eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Dan and Martin, James H.. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. New York: Prentice Hall, 2009. These two tasks are commonly designated as named entity extraction and relation extraction. Google Scholar
5. Orr, Dave. “50,000 Lessons on How to Read: a relation extraction corpus.” Online: Google Research Blog, 11 Apr. 2013. Accessed 15 June 2013, http://googleresearch.blogspot.be/2013/04/50000-lessons-on-how-to-read-relation.html.Google Scholar
6. See http://theater.uantwerpen.be/etc.Google Scholar
7. Schuurman, Ineke, Hoste, Véronique, and Monachesi, Paola. “Interacting Semantic Layers of Annotation in SoNaR, a Reference Corpus of Contemporary Written Dutch”. In Calzolari, Nicoletta (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2010.Google Scholar
8. Nunberg, Geoff. “Google Boob: A Metadata Train Wreck”. Online: Language Log, 29 Aug. 2009. Accessed 3 July 2013, http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1701.Google Scholar