Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:13:51.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The London Institute’s i page: creating and maintaining an academic gateway website

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Elizabeth Lawes  and
Jessica Crilly
Elizabeth Lawes*
Affiliation:
The Library, Chelsea College of Art & Design, Manresa Road, London SW3 6LS, UK
Jessica Crilly*
Affiliation:
The Library, London College of Fashion, 20 John Princes Street, London W1G 0BJ, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This overview of the London Institute Library and Learning Resources website, the i page, focuses in particular on issues involved in selecting and evaluating high quality resources in an academic context. The article begins by detailing the philosophy, design and initial construction of the site, and gives an outline of the structure. The most heavily used section of the i page is the web guides and the evaluation criteria applied to web resources selected for inclusion are examined, with reference to the digital art web guide. The main criteria of content, structure, authority and subjectivity are looked at in detail. The process of user feedback is highlighted and, as the site is now over two years old, pertinent issues relating to its future growth and development are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , 2002 , pp. 31 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The i page – http://www.linst.ac.uk/library Google Scholar
2. CAST – Center for Applied Special Technology – http://www.cast.org Google Scholar
3. Bobby (CAST’s web-based tool that analyses web pages for their accessibility, in accordance with W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) – http://www.cast.org/bobby Google Scholar
4. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative – http://www.w3.org/WAI/ Google Scholar
5. http://www.tate.org.uk/webart/ Google Scholar
6. http://www.newmediacentre.com/ Google Scholar
7. http://www.ps1.org/cut/proj.html Google Scholar
8. http://www.sfmoma.org/espace/espace_overview.html Google Scholar
9. http://www.adam.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
10. http://www.newmedia-arts.org Google Scholar
11. http://www.diacenter.org/index.html Google Scholar
12. http://www.e-2.org/ Google Scholar
13. http://www.walkerart.org/gallery9/ Google Scholar
14. http://www.whitney.org/bitstreams/ Google Scholar
15. http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/digital/ Google Scholar
16. The Resource Discovery Network – http://www.rdn.ac.uk Google Scholar
17. JISC User Behaviour Monitoring & Evaluation Framework. 1st Annual Report. Professor Jennifer Rowley, August 2000. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub00m&e_rep1.html Google Scholar
18. See Porter, Georgina. ‘The Resource Discovery Network Creative Arts and Industries consultancy’. Art libraries journal vol. 26 no. 3, p. 14–17.Google Scholar