Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:30:21.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learning to live with risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Peter B. Hirtle*
Affiliation:
Cornell University, 2B53 Kroch Library, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Get access

Abstract

How can cultural heritage institutions use new technologies to improve access to holdings for remote users when so much material is protected by copyright and the repository is normally not the copyright owner? Many American institutions have put material online even when they do not own the copyright, after taking thoughtful measures to minimize the risk that this may incur. Others have elected to forego any efforts to control the use of public domain reproductions from their holdings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The most recent edition is Padfield, Tim, Copyright for archivists and records managers, 4th ed. (London: Facet Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
2. Florida Atlantic University, Judaica Sound Archives, http://faujsa.fau.edu/jsa/home.php.Google Scholar
3. An example is found on the page devoted to Alma Gluck at http://faujsa.fau.edu/gluck_alma/.Google Scholar
4. See, for example, McSherry, Corynne, No authors have been harmed in the making of this library, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/09/no-authors-have-been-harmed-making-library/.Google Scholar
5. Stratton, Barbara, Seeking new landscapes: a rights clearance study in the context of mass digitisation of 140 books published between 1870 and 2010 (London: British Library, 2011), http://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.ashx?MediaDetailsID=1197.Google Scholar
6. The Thomas E. Watson Papers Digital Collection, http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson/.Google Scholar
7. Dickson, Maggie, ‘Due diligence, futile effort: copyright and the digitization of the Thomas E. Watson Papers,’ American Archivist 73, no. 2 (Fall/Winter 2010): 626636.Google Scholar
10. George Eastman House and The Commons on Flickr, http://www.eastmanhouse.org/flickr/statement.php.Google Scholar
11. Cornell University, Guide to the Ezra Cornell papers, 1746-1888, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/ead/htmldocs/RMA00001.html.Google Scholar
14. OCLC, Undue Diligence: Seeking Low-Risk Strategies for Making, Collections of Unpublished Materials More Acessible, http://www.oclc.org/research/events/2010-03-11.htm.Google Scholar
15. OCLC, Well-intentioned practice for putting digitized collections of unpublished materials online, http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/rights/practice.pdf.Google Scholar
17. Triangle Research Libraries Network’s Intellectual Property Rights Strategy for Digitization of Modern Manuscript Collections and Archival Record Groups, http://www.trln.org/IPRights.pdf.Google Scholar
18. Society of American Archivists, Orphan works: statement of best practices, http://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/OrphanWorks-June2009.pdf.Google Scholar
19. Cornell University, ILR School, Kheel Center Labor Photos, http://www.laborphotos .Cornell. edu/.Google Scholar
20. Cornell University, ILR School, Kheel Center Labor Photos, http://www.laborphotos.cornell.edu/copyright.php.Google Scholar
21. Examples of when the use of thumbnails without permission has been found to be acceptable include Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 E3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003); Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. 508 E3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007); and Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersky Limited 448 F 3d 605 (2nd Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
22. Association of Art Museum Directors, AAMD Policy on the Use of ‘Thumbnail’ Digital Images in Museum Online Initiatives,’ 19 January, 2011, http://aamd.org/papers/documents/AAMDFairUseGuidelinesHLP1-10-1 l_2_.pdf. The policy defines a thumbnail as an image that is less than 250 × 300 pixels in size.Google Scholar
23. Wythe, Deborah, ‘Rights transparency: the Brooklyn Museum copyright project,’ presentation at the MCN Museum Computer Network conference, 28 October 2010, Austin, Texas, http://www.slideshare.net/dwythe/mcn-2010-brooklynmuseumcopyrightprojectwy the-5634335/.Google Scholar
26. Butler, Kathleen Connolly, ‘Keeping the world safe from naked-chicks-in-art refrigerator magnets: the plot to control art images in the public domain through copyrights in photographic and digital reproductions,’ Hastings communications & entertainment law journal 21 (Fall, 1998): 55.Google Scholar
27. Wikimedia Commons, User:Dcoetzee/NPG legal threat, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Dcoetzee/NPG_legal_threat/.Google Scholar
28. Moeller, Erik, ‘Protecting the public domain and sharing our cultural heritage,’ 16 July 2009, http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/07/16/protecting-the-public-domain-and-sharing-our-cultural-heritage/.Google Scholar
29. Hamma, Kenneth, ‘Public domain art in an age of easier mechanical reproducibility,’ D-Lib magazine 11, No. 11, (November 2005), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november05/hamma/1lhamma.html. Reprinted in Art libraries journal 31, no.3 (2006): 11-15.Google Scholar
31. The new policy is found at http://cdl.library.Cornell.edu/guidelines. A discussion of why we made this decision is found here: Hirtle, Peter and Donovan, Tricia, ‘Removing All Restrictions: Cornell’s New Policy on Use of Public Domain Reproductions.’ Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 266 (October 2009): 16, http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/rli/archive/rIi266.shtml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. The National Archives, Open Government Licence for public sector information, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/.Google Scholar