No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What is the point of saving old buildings?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 August 2008
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper was written for a special issue of the Ekaterinburg Architecton devoted to the rich Constructivist heritage of that hitherto closed city beyond the Urals. Docomomo-Russia has an active working party there, but the combination of public poverty and vigorous real-estate pressures is making the fate of these buildings uncertain. This paper sought to offer some fundamental structuring ideas to the debate. We publish it here to stimulate discussion of problems also current elsewhere, but the author stresses that it should be read with its original purpose and audience in mind.
- Type
- Issues
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000
References
Allan, J. (1998). ‘MOMO's second chance: the revaluation of inner urban housing in Britain’, in Cunningham, A. (ed.), Modern Movement Heritage, E & FN Spon, London. Also a shorter version in Vision and Reality: Proceedings of the Fifth International Docomomo Conference, Stockholm, 1998, Swedish Museum of Architecture, Stockholm, 1999.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1936). ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction’ in Benjamin, W. (1973), Illuminations, Fontana, London, pp. 219–253.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. and Richards, I. (1993). ‘Modern Movement documentation as a central resource for architectural education’, Proceedings of the Second International Docomomo Conference, Dessau,1992, Bauhaus e.V., Dessau.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment and Department of National Heritage, Planning Policy Guidance 15, September 1994, reproduced as Appendix C in: Delafons, J. (1997).Google Scholar
Henket, H-J. (1998). ‘The icon and the ordinary’ in Cunningham, A. (ed.) (1998), Modern Movement Heritage, E & FN Spon, London.Google Scholar
Heynen, H. (1991). ‘The issue of transitoriness in modern architecture’, Proceedings of the First International Conference of Docomomo, Eindhoven,1990,Eindhoven University of Technology,Eindhoven, republished in Cunningham, A., (ed.) (1998), Modern Movement Heritage, E & FN Spon, London. Also Henket H-J. (1998), ‘The icon and the ordinary’, in Cunningham, A. (ed.) (1998).Google Scholar
Hollmgdale, R.J., (tr.) in Nietzsche, F. (1990). Beyond Good and Evil, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
de jonge, W. (1991) ‘Contemporary requirements and the conservation of typical technology of the Modern Movement’, Proceedings of the First International Conference of Docomomo, Eindhoven,1990,Eindhoven University of Technology,Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Morris, W. (1877). Manifesto of the Society for Protection of Ancient Buildings, quoted in: Delafons (1997).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1874). ‘On the uses and disadvantages of history for life’ in Untimely Meditations (Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen), English edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 57–123.Google Scholar
Pawley, M. (1991). ‘A modern morituri’, Proceedings of the First International Conference of Docomomo, Eindhoven,1990,Eindhoven University of Technology,Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Reinink, W. (1991). ‘Controversy between functionalism and restoration: keep Zonnestraal for eternity as a ruin’, Proceedings of the First International Conference of Docomomo, Eindhoven, 1990, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Ruskin, J. (1849). The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Constable, London facsimile edition, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access