Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:55:08.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research in UK architecture schools: clarification and case studies. Expert clarification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2002

Bryan Lawson
Bryan Lawson
Affiliation:
Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Your leader (arq 6/1, p3) correctly concluded that the latest round of the UK Government's Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) results are the best yet overall for those departments in universities that include the subject of architecture. But we are in danger of misinterpreting this complex set of results as a result of some other more emotive and unclear arguments. Let me take the process apart slightly in order to clarify.

Type
letters
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 101 - 106
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Letters should be addressed to Peter Carolin, arq, c/o University of Cambridge Department of Architecture, 1 Scroope Terrace, Cambridge CB2 1PX, UK; F +44 (0)1223 332960 or Email [email protected]. The Editors reserve the right to shorten letters.