Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:09:34.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moving architecture and flattening politics: examining adaptability through a narrative of design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2012

Robert Schmidt
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, [email protected]
Daniel Sage
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, [email protected]
Toru Eguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, [email protected]
Andy Dainty
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, [email protected]

Extract

Our paper addresses how building design elucidates the connection between two definitions of politics: ‘Big Politics’ and micropolitics. We will seek to examine how these two versions of politics are imbricated; how, in other words, codified ideologies and political institutions circulate within the everyday practices by which new actors and sites of contestation enter the social collective. The conceptual space for this argument has already been mapped out by various authors, including Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Bruno Latour and Michel Foucault. These authors have variously proposed how powerful totalities always travel along small, fragile conduits. Or, as Deleuze and Guattari put it, ‘the boss's office is as much at the end of the hall as on top of the tower’.

Type
practice
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)