Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:14:02.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gottfried Semper: towards a comparative science of architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Mari Hvattum
Mari Hvattum
Affiliation:
Institut for Byggekunst Norwegian Institute of TechnologyNTH 7034 Trondheim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates Gottfried Semper's use of comparative science as a basis for a theory of architecture. It traces Semper's reliance on the works of Jean-Nicholas-Louis Durand and the zoologist Georges Cuvier. Following Michel Foucault's argument that the emergence of comparative science entails a decisive transition in modern thought, the paper explores the origins and implications of Semper's comparative theory of architecture. Through this focus, the paper attempts to identify and explore an essential tension inherent in Semper's work between, on the one hand, his sensitive recognition of the symbolic significance of architecture, and on the other, the proto-positivism implied in his ‘science of invention’. This dilemma still conditions our contemporary architectural culture, making the study of Semper's complex and conflicting ideas more relevant than ever.

Type
Theory
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 68 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, M. H. (1953). The Mirror and the Lamp. Romantic Theory and the Literary Tradition. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1950). The Problem of Knowledge, Philosophy, Science and History since Hegel. Trans. Woglom, W H and Hendel, C W. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. (1964). Georges Cuvier, Zoologist. A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuvier, G. (1964). Essay on Zoological Analogies. Trans. Coleman, W, in W Coleman: Georges Cuvier, Zoologist. A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. (1964). Fragment on Artificial and Natural Classification Systems. Trans. Coleman, W, in W Coleman; Georges Cuvier, Zoologist. A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1985). Three Epochs of Modern Aesthetics and Its Present Task, trans. Michael Neville, in Neville, , Makkreel, and Rodi, (eds.) Selected Works volume 5, pp.175–222. Princeton.Google Scholar
Durand, J. N. L. (1800). Recueil et Paralléle de Édifices de Tout Genres, Anciens et Modemes, à I'École Polytecnique, Paris.Google Scholar
Durand, J. N. L. (1802–1805). Précis des Lécons d'architecture données à I'École Polytecnique, Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things, An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. Foucault, M, Tavistock Publications, London.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and Method, trans. Weinheimer, J and Marshall, D G, Sheed and Ward, London.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of Judgement, trans. Pluhar, W S, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1902). Kritik der reinen Vemunft, in Kants gesammelte Schriften, Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin.Google Scholar
Legrand, J. G. (1809). Introduction to Durand's Recuil et Paralléle de édifices en tout Genres, second ed.Chez, L'Auteur, L'Ecole, ARoyale Polytechnique, Paris.Google Scholar
Mallgrave, H. F. (1989). Introduction to Gottfried Semper, The Four Elements of Architecture and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peréz-Goméz, A. (1983). Architecture and the Crisis of European Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Rykwert, J. (1982). Semper and the Conception of Style, in The Necessity of Artifice, 1982, London, Academy Editions, pp.122–130.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1851). The Four Elements of Architecture, A Contribution to the Comparative Study of Architecture, in The Four Elements of Architecture and Others Writings, trans. Mallgrave, H F and Herrmann, W, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1852 a.) Science, Industry, Art, In The Four Elements of Architecture and Others Writings, trans. Mallgrave, H F and Herrmann, W, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1852b). Prospectus to Comparative Theory of Building. In The Four Elements of Architecture and Others Writings, trans. Mallgrave, H F and Herrmann, W, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1853a.) London Lecture of November 11, 1853. Edited with a preface by Mallgrave, H F in Res Journal of Anthropology of Aesthetics No 6 Autumn 1983, pp 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semper, G. (1859a). Prospectus to Der Stil, In The Four Elements of Architecture and Others Writings, trans. Mallgrave, H F and Herrmann, W, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1859b). The Attributes of Formal Beauty, trans. Herrmann, W. in Herrmann, W. (1984). Gottfried Semper, In Search of Architecture. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1859c). A Critical Analysis and Prognisis of Present-Day Artistic Production, trans. Herrmann, W. in Herrmann, W. (1984). Gottfried, Semper, In Search of Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1860). Der Stil in den technischen und tektonischen Künsten, Oder Practische Aesthetik. Ein Handbuch für Techniker, Künstler und Kunstfreunde. Vol 1. Mäander Kunstverlag, Mittenwald 1977.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1979). Kleine Schriften, Herausgegeben von Hans und Manfred Semper. Mäander Kunstverlag, Mittenwald.Google Scholar
Stockmeyer, E. (1939) Gottfried Sempers Kunsttheorie, Rascher, Zurich.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (1880). Gottfried Semper, ein Bild seines Lebens un Wirkens. S Calvary, Berlin.Google Scholar
Vesely, D. (1987). Architecture and the Conflict of Representation, AA- files no 8.Google Scholar
Vidler, A. (1977). The Idea of Type. The Transformation of the Academic Ideal, 1750–1830. Oppositions no 8.Google Scholar
Vidler, A. (1987). The Writing of the Walls, Princeton.Google Scholar
Villari, S. (1990). JNL Durand (1760–1843). Art and Science of Architecture. Rizzoli, New York.Google Scholar