Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:19:12.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generative design defended Gender differences discussed

Towards a dimensionless topologic rigour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2003

Kristina Shea
Affiliation:
Cambridge

Extract

Generative design techniques (‘Digital canopy: high-end computation/low-tech construction’ arq 6/3, pp230–245) tend to intrigue and slightly scare (arq 6/4, pp293–294 – letter from Sam Price) at the same time. It is reassuring to know that computers will only be as smart as we can program them. We can even control if they learn and how they learn. Design capabilities using generative methods agreeably are a product of both how smart we make the generative algorithms and how intelligently designers can make use of them. A human designer alone probably would not have come up with the canopy design built and a computer alone could not have.

Type
Letters
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)