Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:15:10.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concepts and material associations in the work of Gigon/Guyer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Charles Rattray  and
Graeme Hutton
Charles Rattray
Affiliation:
The Scott Sutherland School of ArchitectureRobert Gordon UniversityGarthdeeAberdeen AB107QBUnited Kingdom
Graeme Hutton
Affiliation:
The School of ArchitectureUniversity of DundeeFaculty of Duncan of JordanstoneDundee DD14HNUnited Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Zürich architects Annette Gigon and Mike Guyer display an enjoyment of the realities – both physical and intellectual – of architectural production and, to this extent, can be seen as part of a prevailing pattern in northern Switzerland. This paper comments on their work and shows it also to be creatively critical, subverting a number of modern orthodoxies and supplanting them with an affective internal logic.

Type
Design
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 16 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, P. (1991) ‘Swiss Essentialists’. In The Architectural Review, vol.189, no.1127, pp.19–23.Google Scholar
Frampton, K. (1996) Studies in Tectonic Culture, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., p.386.Google Scholar
Frei, H. (1996) ‘Simphcity Again’. In Minimal Tradition: Max Bill and ‘Simple’ Architecture 1942–96, Lars Muller Publishers, Baden, p.133.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. and Alter, K. (1994) ‘The Sufficiency of Architecture’. In Construction, Intention, Detail, Artemis, Zurich, pp.6–7.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1947) Mies van der Rohe, Museum of Modern Art, New York. The quote comes from Mies' 1938 inaugural address as Director of Architecture at IIT.Google Scholar
Larkin, P. (1983) Required Writing, Faber & Faber, London, p.211.Google Scholar
Kipnis, J. (1996) ‘Recent Koolhaas’. In El Croquis, issue 79, p.37.Google Scholar
Meili, M. (1996) ‘A Few Remarks Concerning Swiss-German Architecture’. In Architecture et Urbanisme, no.309, 06, pp.24–25.Google Scholar
Porphyrios, D. (1982) Sources of Modern Eclecticism, Academy Editions, London.Google Scholar
Rattray, C. (1997) ‘Claus and Kaan: High Theory and Low Practice’. In Architectural Research Quarterly, vol.2, no.3, spring 1997, pp.26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. (1986) ‘Preface to the Second Italian Edition’. In The Architecture of The City, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., p.166. The hypothesis was outlined after he had written the book.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (1976) ‘Transparency: Literal and Phenomenal’. In The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., p.166.Google Scholar
Smithson, A. and P. (1994) Changing the Art of Inhabitation. Artemis, London, p.117.Google Scholar
Tischhauser, A. (1999) ‘Swiss duo: Gigon and Guyer’. In Architecture Today, no. 97, 04, pp.14–23.Google Scholar
Venturi, R. (1977) Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, The Architectural Press, London, p.88.Google Scholar
von Moos, S. (1996) ‘Recycling Max Bill’. In Minimal Tradition: Max Bill and ‘Simple’ Architecture 1942–96, Lars Muller Publishers, Baden, p.40.Google Scholar
Wang, W. (1990) Herzog and de Meuron, Rizzoli International, New York, p.7. This catalogue is part of a series produced by Harvard University Graduate School of Design.Google Scholar
Zumthor, P. (1998) Thinking Architecture, Lars Muller Publishers, Baden, p.26.Google Scholar