Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:27:13.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The architecture of justice: iconography and space configuration in the English law court building

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Julienne Hanson
Julienne Hanson
Affiliation:
The Bartlett, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6QB, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of changes is identified in the iconography of the English courtroom, which seems to indicate a gradual liberalisation in the architecture of justice. However, it is suggested that this masks a deeper continuity in the layout and space configuration of the law court building, which relates to the fundamental social programme which it has to fulfil. Configurationallyspeaking, the space of the courtroom, which appears so powerfully to integrate the actors in the courtroom drama, turns out to be ‘virtual’. Although the actors can see and hear each other perfectly well, they actually inhabit separate and mutually-exclusive physical domains. The locus of spatial integration is to be found in the backstage corridors of the law court which, it is argued, is the place where legal negotiations take place. Thus, though it would be theoretically possible to reproduce the social programme of the law court in a virtual reality courtroom, this would be at the expense of a vital generative function served by the building, which is to ensure that specific legal conflicts are resolved in the interests of a wider social justice.

Type
Theory
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Summer 1996 , pp. 50 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Durkheim, E. (1893). The Division of Labour in Society. Trans. Simpson, G., Macmillan Free Press, New York, 1933.Google Scholar
Ernst, B. (1985). The Magic Mirror of M. C. Escher. Tarquin Publications, Norfolk, 1985.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1978). ‘Figures Doors and Passages’. Architectural Design, 04 1978, p.267 and p.271.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, A., Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Goodsell, C. (1988). The Social Meaning of Civic Space: studying political authority through architecture. University Press of Kansas, USA.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. (1973). Trisfes Tropiques. Jonathan Cape, London, 1973, p.246.Google Scholar
Levitas, G. (1978). ‘Anthropology and the Sociology of Streets’. In Anderson, S. ed. On Streets, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Maddox, A. (1994). The Work of a Magistrate. Shaw and Sons, London, p.15.Google Scholar
Mountford, E.W. (1906). ‘The New Sessions House London’. Architectural Review, Vol. 21, p.139.Google Scholar
Pevsner, N. (1976). A History of Building Types. Thames and Hudson, London, p.34.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, A. (1909). The Rites of Passage. Trans. Vizedom, M. and Caffee, G., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1960.Google Scholar