Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:08:12.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretations of Vitruvius Critical misunderstandings

Parliamentary reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2005

PAOLO TOMBESI
PAOLO TOMBESI
Affiliation:
Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I was pleasantly surprised by the interest generated by my article on the making of the Australian Parliament House in Canberra (7/2, pp140–154), and intrigued by the parallels drawn between its saga and that of the new Scottish Parliament; but I feel the need to respond to some of the comments by Charles McKean, published in the following issue of arq (7/3+4, pp199–200).

Type
Letters
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 102
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)