Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:07:52.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Centre and the Periphery: some reflections on the nature and conduct of architectural research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Dean Hawkes
Dean Hawkes
Affiliation:
Welsh School of ArchitectureUniversity of Wales College of CardiffBute BuildingKing Edward VII AvenueCardiff CF1 3APUnited Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper, which is based upon a talk given to the Martin Centre Research Society at the Department of Architecture at Cambridge in October 1994, examines the continuing relevance of the model of architectural research which was proposed at the Oxford Conference on architectural education in 1958. It suggests that the Oxford model, with its roots in the procedures of the sciences, in which ‘fundamental’ research precedes ‘development’, before leading into practical application, fails to account for the role of the designer in the evolution of the state of architecture. It also proposes that developments in architectural education, in particular the growth of the unit system of studio instruction, have added a further element to the productive and investigative potential of the schools of architecture, and that this must be accounted for in any valid model of research.

Type
Issues
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 8 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, N. V. and Steemers, K. (1994). The LT Method, version 2.0, Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hawkes, D. (1992). Evolution of a Theory, Building Design, 3rd 04 1992.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
March, L. (1976). The Logic of Design and the Question of Value. In (ed) March, L., The Architecture of Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martin, L. (1958). Report on the Oxford Conference, Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, 06 1958.Google Scholar
Martin, L. (1967). Architect's Approach to Architecture, Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, 04 1967.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, I. (1959). Conversations with Igor Stravinsky. Faber and Faber Ltd., London.Google Scholar