Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:23:30.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vulgar Modernism: J. M. Richards, Modernism and the Vernacular in British Architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2016

Jessica Kelly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1946 J. M. Richards, editor of the Architectural Review (AR) and self-proclaimed champion of modernism, published a book entitled The Castles on the Ground (Fig. 1). This book, written while working for the Ministry of Information (Mol) in Cairo during the war, was a study of British suburban architecture and contained long, romantic descriptions of the suburban house and garden. Richards described the suburb as a place in which ‘everything is in its place’ and where ‘the abruptness, the barbarities of the world are far away’. For this reason The Castles on the Ground is most often remembered as a retreat from pre-war modernism, into nostalgia for mock-Tudor houses and privet hedges. The writer and critic Reyner Banham, who worked with Richards at the AR in the 1950s, described the book as a ‘blank betrayal of everything that Modern Architecture was supposed to stand for’. More recently, however, it has been rediscovered and reassessed for its contribution to mid-twentieth-century debates about the relationship between modern architects and the British public. These reassessments get closer to Richards’s original aim for the book. He was not concerned with the style of suburban architecture for its own sake, but with the question of why the style was so popular and what it meant for the role of modern architects in Britain and their relationship to the ‘man in the street’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 58 , 2015 , pp. 229 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Richards, J. M., The Castles on the Ground, 2nd edn (London, 1973), p. 13.Google Scholar

2 Richards, J. M., Memoirs of an Unjust Fella (London, 1980), p. 188.Google Scholar

3 Banham, Reyner, New Brutalism (London, 1966), p. 13.Google Scholar

4 See Powers, Alan, Britain: Modern Architectures in History (London, 2007)Google Scholar; and Erten, Erdem, ‘The Hollow Victory of Modern Architecture and the Quest for the Vernacular: J. M. Richards and “the Functional Tradition”’, in Built from Below: British Architecture and The Vernacular, ed. Guillery, Peter (London, 2011), pp. 145–68.Google Scholar

5 This phrase ‘the man in the street’ is used repeatedly in Richards’s 1940 book: Richards, J. M., Introduction to Modem Architecture (London, 1940).Google Scholar

6 Richards, , Castles on the Ground, p. 19.Google Scholar

7 See for example Whyte, William, ‘The Englishness of English Architecture: Modernism and the Making of a National International Style’, The journal of British Studies, vol. 48 no. 2 (2009), pp. 441–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Shand, Philip Morton, ‘Scenario for Human Drama’, The Architectural Review (July, 1934), pp. 9–15.Google Scholar

9 Pevsner, Nikolaus, Pioneers of the Modern Movement: From William Morris to Walter Gropius(London, 1936).Google Scholar

10 Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society, 1780–1950, 3rd edn (London, 1963; first published: London, 1958),p. 17 Google Scholar.

11 See Erten, , ‘The Hollow Victory’, p. 150.Google Scholar

12 Richards, , Castles on the Ground, p. 57.Google Scholar

13 Richards, J. M., ‘Criticism’, The Architectural Review (January, 1941), pp. 132–36 (p. 132).Google ScholarPubMed

14 See for example Darling, Elizabeth, Reforming Britain: Narratives of Modernity Before Reconstruction (London,2007), p. 3.Google Scholar

15 Williams, Richard J., The Anxious City: British Urbanism in the Late 20th Century (Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar

16 Williams, , The Anxious City, p. 34.Google Scholar

17 Zurich, Institute of History and Theory of Architecture, GTA Archives, Haefeli, Moser, Steiger Papers, J. M. Richards, ‘Architectural Expression’, CIAM 6 Congress (September, 1946). Reading (Berks), BBC Written Archive, J. M. Richards, ‘Vision and Design: English Architectural Taste — 2’, on BBC Far Eastern Service (July 1946).

18 Gold, John, The Experience of Modernism: Modern Architects and the Future City, 1928-1953 (London, 1997), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

19 Morphet, Richard, in Binyon, Helen, Eric Ravilious: Memoir of an Artist (edn Cambridge, 2007), p. 8.Google Scholar

20 Goldhagen, Sarah Williams, ‘Something to Talk About: Modernism, Discourse, Style’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 64.2 (June 2005), pp. 144–67 (p. 161).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 See Erten, , ‘The Hollow Victory’; Powers, Britain; and Andrew Higgott, Mediating Modernism: Architectural Cultures in Britain (London, 2006).Google Scholar

22 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 43.Google Scholar

23 Interview with Gloag, John, in Lasdun, Susan, ‘H. de C Reviewed’, The Architectural Review (September, 1996), pp. 68–74 (p. 69).Google Scholar

24 The Editors, ‘The First Half Century’, The Architectural Review (January, 1947), pp. 150–65.Google ScholarPubMed

25 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 117.Google Scholar

26 The Origins of Modern Critical Thought: German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism From Lessing to Hegel, ed. Simpson, David (Cambridge, 1988), p. 357.Google Scholar

27 Chermayeff, Serge, ‘A New Spirit and Idealism’, The Architects’ Journal (November, 1931), pp.619–20 (p. 619).Google Scholar

28 Breuer, Marcel, ‘Where do we Stand?’, The Architectural Review (April, 1935), pp. 134–40 (p. 136).Google Scholar

29 Richards, J. M., ‘Towards a Rational Aesthetic’, The Architectural Review (December 1935), pp. 211–20 (p. 211)Google Scholar

30 Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Civilisation (New York, 1934)Google Scholar; as quoted in Richards, ‘Towards a Rational Aesthetic’, p. 211.

31 Richards, , ‘Rational Aesthetic’, p. 216.Google Scholar

32 Bearer, Karen Anne, Irene Rice Pereira: Her Paintings and Philosophy (Texas, 1993), p. 15.Google Scholar

33 Pevsner, Nikolaus, ‘Early and High Baroque’ in Games, Steven, Pevsner the Early Life: Germany and Art (London, 2011), p. 182.Google Scholar

34 Richards, J. M., The Functional Tradition in Early Industrial Buildings(London, 1958), p. 14.Google Scholar

35 Piper, John, ‘Nautical Style’, The Architectural Review (January, 1938), pp. 1–14 Google Scholar. London, Tate Archive, TGA 200410/3/2/17, John and Myfanwy Piper Papers, Myfanwy Piper, ‘Writing About Jim’.

36 Lewes, East Sussex Records Office, Peggy Angus Archive, letter dated May 1937.

37 Piper, John, ‘Fully Licensed’, The Architectural Review (March, 1940), pp. 87–101.Google Scholar

38 See for example Erten, , ‘The Hollow Victory’, p. 150.Google Scholar

39 Richards, J. M., ‘The Condition of Architecture and the Principle of Anonymity’, Circle: International Survey of Constructive Art, ed. by Martin, J. L., Nicholson, Ben and Gabo, Naum (London, 1937), pp. 184–91 (p. 185).Google Scholar

40 Richards, , ‘The Condition of Architecture and the Principle of Anonymity’, p. 185.Google Scholar

41 Bristol, The Penguin Archive, DM1843/15/4, Letters to Richards from Allan Lane, 1938.

42 Richards, , An Introduction to Modern Architecture, p. 79.Google Scholar

43 Hegel, G. W. F., preface to Philosophy of Right, trans. Dyde, S. W. (edn New York, 2005), p. xviii.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., p.xix.

45 Richards, , Castles on the Ground, p. 20.Google Scholar

46 Los Angeles, Getty Research Library, Nikolaus Pevsner Papers, ‘The Elements of Contemporary Architecture in Britain - Historicism and Traditionalism’, 1939.

47 Ibid., letter from Richards to Pevsner dated October 1939.

48 Lewes, East Sussex Records Office, Peggy Angus Archive, letter from Richards to Peggy Angus, April 1936.

49 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 36.Google Scholar

50 See Seddon, Jill, ‘The Architect and the “Arch Pedant”: Sadie Speight, Nikolaus Pevsner and “Design Review”’, The Journal of Design History, 20.1 (2007), pp. 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 96.Google Scholar

52 Ibid., p. 96.

53 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 101 Google Scholar, giving 1932 as the date that they first rented Brick House; Binyon, , Eric Ravilious, p. 58 Google Scholar

54 Ibid.

55 It was at Furlongs that Eric Ravilious met Helen Binyon and they began an affair that lasted until 1938: Binyon, , Eric Ravilious, p. 64.Google Scholar

56 Lewes, East Sussex Records Office, Peggy Angus Archive, Peggy Angus Archive, letter from Richards to Peggy Angus, undated.

57 Ibid., Report of the County Archivist (April 2006–March 2007), p. 7.

58 Ibid., Peggy Angus Archive, letter from Richards to Peggy Angus, undated.

59 Ibid.

60 Spalding, Frances, John and Myfanwy: a life in art (Oxford, 2009), p. 72 Google Scholar

61 Binyon, Eric Ravilious, p. 60 Google Scholar: letter from Charlotte Bawden to Gwyneth Lloyd-Thomas, 1932.

62 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 101.Google Scholar

63 Jones, Barbara, The Unsophisticated Arts (London, 1951).Google Scholar

64 James Russell at http://jamesrussellontheweb.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-unsophisticated-genius-of- barbara.html (accessed 31 April 2015).

65 Harrod, Tanya, ‘Peggy Angus Obituary’, The Independent, 2 November, 1982, p. 78.Google Scholar

66 Binyon, , Eric Ravilious, p. 66.Google Scholar

67 Martin, Leslie, ‘The State of Transition’ Circle, pp. 108–218 (p. 217).Google ScholarPubMed

68 For more details see Gold, The Experience of Modernism.

69 ‘MARS the Pictoral Record’, The Architectural Review (March, 1938), pp. 99–112 (p. 109)Google ScholarPubMed.

70 Ibid.

71 Gold, , The Experience of Modernism, p. 125.Google Scholar

72 London, Royal Institute of British Architects Archive, SAG/92/1/(2/2), Godfrey Samuel Papers, letter from Richards to MARS group, 26 November 1936.

73 Richards, J. M., ‘Architecture and The Public’, The Architectural Review (May, 1937), pp. 200–05 (P. 203)Google Scholar

74 Richards, , An Introduction to Modern Architecture, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

75 Ibid., p. 11.

76 Richards, J. M., ‘Criticism’, The Architectural Review(June, 1941), pp. 132–36 (p. 132).Google ScholarPubMed

77 Richards, , Introduction to Modern Architecture, p. 12.Google Scholar

78 Richards, , ‘Criticism’ (June, 1941), p.132.Google ScholarPubMed

79 Richards, J. M., ‘Criticism’, The Architectural Review (February, 1940), pp. 66–70 (p. 67).Google ScholarPubMed

80 Richards, , ‘Criticism’, The Architectural Review (June, 1941), p. 132.Google ScholarPubMed

81 Richards, , Castles on the Ground, p. 20.Google Scholar

82 Richards, , Memoirs, p. 158.Google Scholar

83 Ibid., p. 160.

84 Zurich, Institute of History and Theory of Architecture, GTA Archives, Haefeli, Moser, Steiger Papers, J. M. Richards, Report on MARS Group: war and post-war (1947).

85 Williams, , The Anxious City, p. 32.Google Scholar

86 Sussex, Mass Observation Archive, (1/6/D), ‘Liking/disliking own home’, p. 30.Google Scholar

87 Reading (Berks), BBC Written Archive, Richards, , ‘Vision and Design: English Architectural Taste — 2’, pp. 2–5.Google Scholar

88 Zurich, Institute of History and Theory of Architecture, GTA Archives, General Secretariat Papers, Minutes from Meeting of CIRPAC in London (July 1946), p. 2.

89 Ibid., Letter from Sigfried Giedion to Hartland-Thomas (25 July 1946).

90 Ibid.

91 Ibid., General Secretariat Papers, Notes of Discussion at MARS Group Meeting (undated).

92 Ibid., Haefeli, Moser, Steiger Papers, Richards, , ‘Architectural Expression’, p. 1.Google Scholar

93 Ibid., pp. 2-3.

94 Eliot, T. S., Notes Toward a Definition of Culture (edn London 1962), p. 36.Google Scholar

95 Ibid., p. 44.

96 Ibid., p. 37.

97 London, Tate Archive, TGA 955/1/1/10, ICA Papers, ‘Minutes of the Second Meeting of the Organising Committee’ (20 February 1946).

98 Ibid., TGA 955/1/1/10, ICA Papers, ICA Statement of Policy and Aims.

99 Richards, J. M., ‘The Next Step’, The Architectural Review (March, 1950), pp. 164–69 (p. 165).Google ScholarPubMed

100 Ibid., p. 168.

101 Ibid., p. 165.

102 Ibid.

103 Hugh Casson first appeared on the MARS members list in March 1945.

104 Banham, Reyner, ‘Stocktaking, 5’, The Architectural Review (June, 1960), pp. 380–92 (p. 381).Google Scholar

105 Richards, J. M., ‘Hats Off — Watney Lettering’, The Architectural Review (November, 1960), pp. 376–80Google Scholar; idem, ‘Criticism: Stockholm, New Commercial Centre’, The Architectural Review(August, 1961), pp. 105–07Google Scholar; idem, ‘Report From Romania’, The Architectural Review (September, 1965), pp. 189–99Google ScholarPubMed; idem, ‘The Painted Churches of Moldavia’, The Architectural Review (March, 1966), pp. 183–90.Google Scholar

106 Richards, J. M., ‘Gourna: a lesson in basic architecture’, The Architectural Review (February, 1970), pp. 10–22.Google Scholar

107 Banham, Reyner, ‘Criticism: Pirelli Building Milan’, The Architectural Review (March, 1961), pp. 195–98Google Scholar; idem, ‘The obsolescent airport’, The Architectural Review (October, 1962), pp. 252–58Google Scholar; idem, ‘Speed the Citizen, urban rapid transit and the future of cities’, The Architectural Review (August, 1964), pp. 103–10Google Scholar; idem, ‘Towards a million-volt light and sound culture’, The Architectural Review (May, 1967), pp. 331–38.Google Scholar

108 Banham, Reyner, ‘On Trial: 5’, The Architectural Review(July, 1962), pp. 42–49 (p. 43).Google Scholar

109 Ibid., p. 45.

110 ‘Stocktaking 1’, in The Architectural Review (February, 1960), pp. 93–98 Google Scholar; ‘Stocktaking 2’, in idem (March, 1960), pp. 183–90; ‘Stocktaking 3’, in idem (April, 1960), pp. 253–60; ‘Stocktaking 4’, in idem (May, 1960), pp. 352–61; ‘Stocktaking, 5’, in idem (June, 1960), pp. 381–91.

111 Banham, Reyner, in ‘Stocktaking 5’, The Architectural Review (June, 1960), pp. 384–94 (p. 386).Google Scholar

112 Banham described these efforts at ‘education’ as nothing more than attempts ‘to equip the working classes with middle-class responses’; see Banham, Reyner, ‘The Atavism of a Short Distance Mini Cyclist’, Living Arts , no. 3 (1963), pp. 91–97 (p. 87).Google Scholar

113 Banham, , ‘Zoom Wave Hits Architecture’, New Society (3 March 1966), pp. 64–69.Google Scholar

114 Banham, ‘The Atavism of a Short Distance Mini Cyclist’, p. 87.Google Scholar

115 London, BBC Video Archive, Donat, John, ‘American Architecture’ (aired November, 1969).Google Scholar

116 This was three years before the book Learning from Las Vegas was published.

117 Richards, J. M., ‘RIBA Discourse: The Hollow Victory’, The Journal of the RIBA (May, 1972), pp. 189–99(P.197).Google Scholar

118 Ibid., p. 194.

119 Richards, , Castles on the Ground, p. 10.Google Scholar

120 Ibid., p. 9

121 Taylor, Nicholas, The Village in the City (London, 1973) p. 21.Google Scholar

122 Ibid., p. 19.

123 Ibid., p. 220.

124 Zurich, Institute of History and Theory of Architecture, GTA Archives, General Secretariat Papers, Letter from Sigfried Giedion to Hartland-Thomas.